ArticleBMC medical education2026
Perceptions of pediatric neurologists on the ideal candidate: a nationwide survey.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPediatric neurology residency selection is increasingly holistic globally, yet the specific attributes prioritized by program directors (PDs) in Saudi Arabia and the United Arab of Emirates (UAE), where Saudi Commission for Health Specialties (SCFHS)-accredited programs are established, remain unexamined. This study investigates the perceptions of PDs, compared to non-PD pediatric neurologists, regarding the ideal candidate.
methodsA multicenter, cross-sectional survey was distributed to pediatric neurology physicians across Saudi Arabia and the UAE, including 9 PDs and 34 non-PD faculty. The mixed-methods survey assessed the importance of academic credentials, non-cognitive attributes, and other qualifications using Likert scales, ranking exercises, and free-text responses. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, multivariable logistic regression, and thematic analysis of free-text responses.
resultsQuantitative analysis of attribute rankings identified professionalism/attitude (69.8%) and clinical rotation performance (58.1%) as the most frequently cited critical factors. Thematic analysis of open-ended responses further elucidated these priorities and provided rich contextual detail on the ideal candidate profile. Quantitative ratings confirmed that both groups prioritized these non-cognitive and clinical attributes over academic metrics. However, significant differences emerged: PDs rated communication skills substantially higher than non-PDs (mean 5.0 vs. 4.5, p=0.03) and also assigned greater importance to interview performance (mean 4.7 vs. 3.9, p=0.04). Multivariable analysis confirmed that valuing communication skills (aOR=5.81; 95% CI: 1.18–28.6; p=0.03) and interview performance (aOR=2.45; 95% CI: 1.02–5.88; p=0.045) were independent predictors of being a PD.
conclusionWhile the pediatric neurology community broadly endorses a holistic selection model, PDs in Saudi Arabia and the UAE distinctly prioritize superior communication skills and interview performance. These findings suggest that refining selection processes to effectively evaluate these competencies is essential for aligning recruitment with the priorities of those overseeing training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.