ArticleBMC urology2026
Utility of prostate-specific antigen density and its correlation with Gleason grade groups: a hospital-based cross-sectional study among patients with prostate-related urinary symptoms at Bugando Medical Centre, Mwanza, Tanzania.
Article in BMC urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAt Bugando Medical Centre, prostate cancer contributes to 39% of all cancers in male patients admitted to the Oncology department, and the majority have high Gleason grades. Although Prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD) has been shown to improve the diagnostic accuracy of prostate cancer and to triage patients for prostate biopsy, there is a significant variation across geographical locations.
methodsA hospital-based cross-sectional study among patients with prostate-related urinary symptoms at Bugando Medical Centre, Mwanza, Tanzania. The study analyzed prostate-specific antigen levels, prostate volume, and total PSA using Maglumi 2000 and a computer system. Histopathological examination involved transrectal biopsy, TURP, and open prostatectomy. The optimal cutoff for PSA density was determined using the receiver operating characteristic curve.
resultsOf the 287 patients, the overall mean age of 71.2 (± 10.2) years. 99 (34.5%) participants were diagnosed with prostate cancer. The area under the curve for prostate-specific antigen density and PSA was 0.9094 (0.8761–0.9426) and 0.8932 (0.8569–0.9295), respectively. The PSAD optimal cut-off was 0.23ng/ml2, giving sensitivity of 86.9% and specificity of 82.4% for prostate cancer prediction. Using this cutoff reduces prostate biopsies by 54.5%. There was a weak positive correlation (Spearman’s rho (ρ) = 0.2456) between prostate-specific antigen density and Gleason grade groups.
conclusionsThe correlation between PSAD and Gleason grade groups observed in this study suggests that higher PSAD is associated with more aggressive cancer. This makes PSAD a valuable tool in guiding biopsy decisions, risk stratification, and treatment planning in patients with prostate-related urinary symptoms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.