ArticleBMC palliative care2026
'Phase of Illness' in oncology patients receiving specialist palliative home care: a mixed methods study on phase-specific burden, needs and use of resources.
Article in BMC palliative care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundData on ‘Phase of Illness’ in specialist palliative home care are not available in Switzerland. Our aim was to investigate oncology patients’ and family caregivers’ experiences of burden, needs and corresponding resource use within each ‘Phase of Illness’ and therefore to obtain an in-depth description of the characteristics of each ‘Phase of Illness’.
methodsConvergent parallel mixed methods design. Quantitative study strand (91 adult oncology patients and 54 family caregivers): medical/sociodemographic characteristics, phase-specific symptoms, burden, needs, use of resources. Qualitative study strand: semi-structured interviews with 8 patients and 12 family caregivers; focus group interviews with 20 nurses. Data analysis: factorial ANOVA, repeated-measurement ANOVA, qualitative content analysis, joint display tables.
resultsOur analysis revealed the following core themes and priorities for action of each ‘Phase of Illness’: “ambivalence” with the aim to “keep it under control” (stable), “anxiety and uncertainty” with the aim of “de-escalation” (unstable), “the tangible end of life” with the aim of “enduring” (deteriorating), “clarity” with the aim of “focusing on essentials” (terminal), and “finality” with the aim of “finding a conclusion” (bereavement).
conclusionsThe findings highlight the vulnerability and complexity of the burden and needs of oncology patients and their families receiving specialist palliative home care in all phases. Particularly in the stable and the bereavement phases, care concepts and funding principles within specialist palliative home care must be ensured to address the psychosocial vulnerability of patients and family caregivers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.