SynthesisBMC oral health2026
The prevalence of dental caries in the first permanent molars among individuals aged 6-18 years: a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies from Asia, Europe, Africa, and Latin America.
Synthesis in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rural-Urban and Demographic Inequalities in Dental Pathology and Diagnostic Patterns in Romanian Emergency Care: A Retrospective Tertiary Clinical Cohort Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Mastering molar mesialization: the role of attachment designs and tipping compensation in clear aligner therapy-a finite element analysis.BMC oral health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDental caries in the first permanent molars, a chronic disease, significantly impairs oral function. However, comprehensive data on its prevalence remain limited. Our study aimed not only to investigate the prevalence of dental caries in the first permanent molars across four regions (Asia, Europe, Africa, and Latin America), but also to provide suggestions for subsequent analysis.
methodsPub Med, web of science, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane library, Wanfang and CNKI database were used to search for studies correlated to the prevalence of dental caries in the first permanent molars among people between 6 and 18 years old, published before 3 January 2026. Meta-analysis was performed using R software. Different effect models (random-effects model or fixed-effect model) were chosen to estimate the pooled prevalence according to the I2 value. The heterogeneity was analyzed by subgroup analysis from perspectives of sample size, publication period, geographic region, World Bank-classified regions (WB region), setting, age, gender, and disease diagnosis. Publication bias was examined using Egger’s test and visualized by the funnel plot.
resultsA total of 768,263 eligible subjects were included in 66 studies from Asia, Europe, Africa, and Latin America. The pooled prevalence of dental caries in the first permanent molars was 0.33 (95%CI: 0.28, 0.38). The subgroup analysis showed that the prevalence of dental caries in the first permanent molars among different geographic regions were as follows: Asia: 0.30 (95%CI: 0.26, 0.35); Africa: 0.53 (95%CI: 0.30, 0.74); Europe: 0.51 (95%CI: 0.35, 0.67); Latin America: 0.48 (95%CI: 0.39, 0.56). The prevalence of dental caries in the first permanent molars among different age groups were 0.31 (95%CI: 0.26, 0.38) in children and 0.45 (95%CI: 0.38, 0.53) in adolescents, respectively. Furthermore, statistically significant differences in the prevalence of dental caries were found in subgroup analyses stratified by WB region, sample size, publication year, sex, and disease diagnosis (all p for subgroup difference < 0.05).
conclusionsThis study demonstrates a relatively high prevalence of dental caries in the first permanent molars across Asia, Europe, Africa, and Latin America, underscoring the need for sustained clinical and public health focus. However, these findings are not generalizable to North America or Oceania due to the absence of data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.