ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2026
Psychometric properties of the Turkish high-activity arthroplasty score in TKA patients.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05217264 (Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of the High Activity Arthroplasty Score), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of the High Activity Arthroplasty Score
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTotal knee arthroplasty (TKA) has become increasingly common in younger and more active patients. However, conventional patient-reported outcome measures frequently demonstrate ceiling effects and fail to capture the high functional demands of this population. The High-Activity Arthroplasty Score (HAAS) was designed to assess advanced functions such as running, stair climbing, and demanding daily activities. This study aims to translate, culturally adapt, and validate the Turkish version of HAAS (T-HAAS) for patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA).
methodsFollowing Beaton’s guidelines, the HAAS was translated, back-translated, and pilot tested. Reliability was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC₂,₁) based on a 7-day test–retest interval, the standard error of measurement (SEM), and the minimal detectable change (MDC). Content validity was ensured through expert committee review and pilot testing. Construct validity was examined via convergent validity, using correlations between the T-HAAS and the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), the Forgotten Joint Score–12 (FJS-12), the Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), and the Short Form Health Survey–36 (SF-36). Agreement was analyzed with Bland–Altman plots, and floor and ceiling effects were determined.
resultsFifty-one patients with TKA (mean age 59.3 ± 5.4 years; 94.1% female) were included. The T-HAAS demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.83) and excellent test–retest reliability (ICC₂,₁ = 0.96; 95% CI: 0.93–0.98). Measurement error indices were low (SEM = 0.55; MDC = 1.52), indicating high measurement precision and score stability. Exploratory factor analysis supported a single-factor structure of the T-HAAS, indicating sufficient one-dimensionality. Construct validity was supported in accordance with predefined hypotheses, with strong correlations observed for KOOS Pain (r = 0.65) and KOOS Sport (r = 0.61), and moderate correlations for the Forgotten Joint Score–12 (r = 0.52), KOOS Function (r = 0.50), and the NPRS (r = − 0.47) (all p < 0.001). Bland–Altman analysis demonstrated excellent agreement between repeated measurements, and no floor or ceiling effects were identified.
conclusionsT-HAAS showed high reliability, strong construct validity, and no floor or ceiling effects in TKA patients.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT05217264. Date of registration 18th January, 2022.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.