ArticleBMC health services research2026
Geographic disparities in EVT access and stroke mortality under universal health coverage in South Korea.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEven in health systems with universal health coverage (UHC), disparities in access to time-sensitive stroke interventions may persist, leading to inequities in patient survival. I aimed to quantify regional disparities in access to endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) and 1-year mortality among patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) in South Korea and to assess associations with individual and regional healthcare factors.
methodsThis retrospective cohort study analyzed the 2021 National Health Insurance Service claims data of 29,755 adults hospitalized with AIS across 250 administrative districts in South Korea. Districts were classified as having no EVT center, a low-volume EVT center (<24 annual cases), or a high-volume EVT center (≥24 annual cases per year). Multilevel logistic regression models were used to assess the association between individual- and regional-level factors with EVT receipt and 1-year mortality. Regional inequalities were further evaluated using Gini coefficients across the adjustment levels.
resultsOf the 29,755 patients, 22.5% resided in districts without EVT centers, 20.5% in low-volume districts, and 57.0% in high-volume districts. After adjusting for age, sex, comorbidities, and stroke severity, patients residing in high-volume districts were more likely to receive EVT (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.27; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.10–1.46) and had lower odds of 1-year mortality (aOR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.73–0.89) than those residing in districts without EVT centers. Regional inequality in EVT access increased after adjustment for individual factors (Gini coefficient, 0.0948 to 0.1353), and mortality inequality also increased (0.0449 to 0.1184), indicating that crude comparisons underestimated the disparities.
conclusionsIn a nationwide UHC system, regional disparities in EVT access and 1-year mortality were modest but persistent and associated with the availability of high-volume EVT centers. Expanding EVT capacity and strengthening prehospital–hospital networks in underserved regions may be associated with reduced inequities in stroke care and improve survival outcomes in patients with stroke.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.