Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41787374›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2026

Enablers and barriers of domiciliary midwifery practice using the socio-ecological model: a qualitative study exploring the perspectives of students and lecturers in Uganda.

Isoke Robert, Felister Apili, Rita Florence Matte, Anna Grace Auma, Caroline Kambugu Nabasirye, Irene Atuhairwe, Brian Agaba, Julie Mann, Winifred Chinyere Ukoha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Isoke RobertDepartment of Midwifery, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Lira University, Lira, Uganda. robertisoke4@gmail.com.
Felister ApiliDepartment of Midwifery, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Lira University, Lira, Uganda.
Rita Florence MatteDepartment of Midwifery, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Lira University, Lira, Uganda.
Anna Grace AumaDepartment of Midwifery, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Lira University, Lira, Uganda.
Caroline Kambugu NabasiryeDepartment of Midwifery, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Lira University, Lira, Uganda.
Irene AtuhairweSeed Global Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Brian AgabaSeed Global Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Julie MannSeed Global Health, Boston, USA.
Winifred Chinyere UkohaDepartment of Midwifery, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Lira University, Lira, Uganda.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly postnatal discharge is increasingly common worldwide, yet the World Health Organization’s recommended 3-3-6 schedule for postnatal visits and assessments is often not adhered to by mothers and healthcare workers. The early neonatal period is critical for both mother and baby, accounting for a significant proportion of maternal and neonatal deaths, especially in developing countries. According to the recently released Midwifery Accelerator, achieving universal coverage of care provided by midwives can avert two-thirds of maternal and newborn deaths, including stillbirths. Domiciliary midwifery practice, where mothers and newborns are followed up at home after discharge, represents a promising model of midwifery continuity of care that can assist in reducing maternal and neonatal mortality. This study therefore, aims to explore the perceived factors influencing domiciliary midwifery practice among midwifery students.

methodsA qualitative descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted using semi-structured interview and focus group discussion guides. Seven key informant interviews and three focus group discussions were conducted among purposively selected lecturers and 20 Bachelor of Midwifery Science students in Lira District, Uganda. Data was collected between May and July 2024, and analyzed using the socio-ecological model, thematic analysis, while NVivo software was used to organize the data.

findingsTwo major themes of barriers and facilitators, with 14 subthemes were identified. Multiple intertwined factors at various levels were found to influence student’s domiciliary midwifery practice. Most of these factors operated at the individual and institutional levels. Individual-level factors included poverty, cultural beliefs, and trust. At the institutional level, factors included the availability of resources, supervision, time constraints, and the working environment. Significant figure influence, attitudes, relationships, and feedback were identified at the interpersonal level.

conclusionMany of the individual and institutional factors that hinder effective domiciliary midwifery practice by students are preventable. Therefore, stakeholder engagement is crucial to address these barriers at all levels, with the ultimate goal of reducing maternal neonatal mortality during the early postnatal period.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelHome Care ServicesMidwiferyStudents, NursingAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFocus GroupsHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancyQualitative ResearchUgandaCommunity midwiferyContinuity of careDomiciliary midwiferyPostnatal careStudent midwives

Identifiers

PMID41787374
PMCPMC13078087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.