ArticleBMC psychiatry2026
Development and validation of an interpretable multi-task prediction model based on heart rate variability for discriminating depression, anxiety and psychiatric comorbidities: a machine learning-driven retrospective study.
Article in BMC psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveDepression and anxiety are significant global public health, their comorbidity share similar clinical symptoms with heterogeneous progression patterns for patients. The early and accurate prediction of anxiety, depression, and comorbidity of anxiety and depression is essential for timely discrimination of high-risk patients, individual treatment strategies, and hierarchical management. This study aimed to develop and validate an interpretable, multi-task prediction model using heart rate variability (HRV) for discriminating anxiety alone, depression alone, and comorbid patients with psychiatric disorders.
methodsPatients diagnosed with anxiety or depression by trained psychiatrists were retrospectively enrolled from the Department of Psychiatry, the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, between March 2024 and April 2025. The Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique (SMOTE) was applied to address class imbalance, and the Recursive feature elimination (RFE) was used for feature selection. Six machine-learning algorithms, including logistic regression (LR), support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), k-nearest neighbor (KNN), and naïve Bayes (NB), were adopt to develop multi-task prediction models for discriminating psychiatric comorbidities. Model performances were evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F1 score, and Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC). The SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) method was used to visualize the feature contributions and interpret the best model.
resultsA total of 546 patients, 114 with anxiety group(20.88%), 100 with depression group (18.32%), and 332 with comorbidity of anxiety and depression (60.81%), were included in this study. The ML-based models were developed for each task using the eleven contributing features. Among the six ML models, the XGBoost achieved the best performance across all tasks. In the validation set, this model achieved the AUCs of 0.8341 (95% confidence interval [CI]:0.761–0.907) for the task of anxiety versus comorbidity of anxiety and depression, and 0.8458(95% CI:0.775–0.917) for the task of depression versus comorbidity of anxiety and depression, respectively. The clinical utility was evaluated using Decision curve analysis (DCA) and calibration curves.
conclusionThe proposed model has potential clinical application prospects and may assist clinicians to improve the accuracy and efficiency of diagnosis, and thereby facilitating timely appropriate intervention measures for patients with psychiatric disorders. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.