SynthesisTherapeutic innovation & regulatory science2026
Systematic Review of Patient Focused Drug Development Meeting Reports for Conditions Affecting Neurodevelopment.
Synthesis in Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundResearchers of rare diseases affecting neurodevelopment struggle with concept and outcome assessment identification issues that are uniquely associated with developmental concepts but common across conditions. However, the potential to capitalize on the collective commonness of rare disease in order to achieve the large samples often required to create and validate clinical outcome assessments is insufficiently tapped. Identifying synergies in concepts of interest across conditions affecting neurodevelopment may accelerate clinical outcome assessment development for prioritized concepts. We conducted the first systematic review of patient focused drug development (PFDD) meeting reports, to identify concepts prioritized by patients and caregivers across conditions.
methodsSixteen reports on rare conditions affecting neurodevelopment were identified. The responses to two survey items, "top three most troublesome symptoms" and "top three ideal treatment targets," were coded into general concepts and the endorsement rates were aggregated across the conditions.
resultsFull consensus about any individual troublesome symptom or treatment target was rare for any condition. Three conditions had no concept that exceeded 30% endorsement. However, for 11 of the 16 conditions, at least 30% of the respondents endorsed the developmental concepts of Communication or Cognitive/Developmental as a most troublesome symptom and as an ideal treatment target.
conclusionsThis empirical support for the shared prioritization of developmental concepts across heterogeneous conditions is an important first step in unifying clinical outcome assessment development efforts to promote clinical trial readiness in rare disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.