SynthesisJournal of neurology2026
Myasthenia gravis and pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Medication use trajectories in myasthenia gravis pregnancies: a population-based drug utilization study.Journal of neurology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMyasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disease with an onset age distribution in women, which peaks within the reproductive age range, leading to a potential interference with pregnancy. In this systematic review, we aim to assess the impact of pregnancy on the course of MG during pregnancy and postpartum period and to identify potential risk factors influencing the postpartum course.
methodsA systematic literature search was conducted in the two databases PubMed and Epistemonikos on the topic "Myasthenia gravis and pregnancy" in October 2025. We included cohort studies and case series with at least 5 cases, reporting the clinical course of MG in women during pregnancy or postpartum period. Quality assessment was performed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) tool for cohort studies.
resultsIn total, 34 studies were included, covering 3720 pregnancies in women with MG. Of 842 pregnancies worsening myasthenic symptoms was reported in 30% of pregnancies most frequently in the first trimester. Postpartum exacerbations were observed in 27% of the cases. However, incidence of worsening and scoring systems differed vastly. Preterm birth was reported at a rate of 9%. Vaginal delivery and cesarean section were performed in 68% and 32% respectively. Of 1530 infants, 9% developed neonatal myasthenia gravis.
conclusionThis review confirms that symptom worsening is most common in the first trimester or postpartum. Women with MG were more likely to require cesarean section or operative vaginal delivery compared to general population data. However, the studies' quality varied widely. Prospective studies are needed to better identify risk factors for complicative course during pregnancy and postpartum period.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.