Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41787122›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Microbiology2026

Diversity, ecology, cell biology and evolution of the Asgard archaea.

Kassiani Panagiotou, Patricia Geesink, Stephan Köstlbacher, Gerben H de Zwaan, Thijs J G Ettema

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kassiani PanagiotouLaboratory of Microbiology, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-1191-7326
Patricia GeesinkLaboratory of Microbiology, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6279-7770
Stephan KöstlbacherLaboratory of Microbiology, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Gerben H de ZwaanLaboratory of Microbiology, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2922-1643
Thijs J G EttemaLaboratory of Microbiology, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands. thijs.ettema@wur.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6898-6377

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Asgard archaea are a clade of archaea that was first discovered through metagenomic surveys of marine sediments. The past decade has witnessed a substantial expansion of their genomic diversity, revealing diverse metabolic repertoires and providing insights into their ecological interactions and function. Notably, comprehensive phylogenomic analyses, together with the identification of numerous eukaryotic signature proteins in Asgard archaeal genomes, have provided compelling evidence that Asgard archaea had a central role in the emergence of eukaryotes. Studies have reported the characterization of cultured Asgard archaeal representatives, uncovering unique cell biological characteristics hinting at thus far undescribed lifestyles. Here, we review the current state of the research field focusing on these intriguing microorganisms and outline future research directions aiming to resolve their ecology, cell biology and evolution.

Indexed as

ArchaeaBiodiversityBiological EvolutionEvolution, MolecularGenetic VariationGenome, ArchaealPhylogeny

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.