Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41787096›Full record

ArticleJournal of mathematical biology2026

Spatial modeling of forest-savanna bistability: impacts of fire dynamics and timescale separation.

Kimberly Shen, Simon Levin, Denis Patterson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of mathematical biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kimberly ShenDepartment of Physics, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, 08544, USA.
Simon LevinDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, 08544, USA.
Denis PattersonDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, Durham University, Stockton Road, Durham DH1 3LE, UK. denis.d.patterson@durham.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4509-7294

Funding

NSF DMS-1951358
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Forest-savanna bistability - the hypothesis that forests and savannas exist as alternative stable states in the tropics - and its implications are key challenges for mathematical modelers and ecologists in the context of ongoing climate change. To generate new insights into this problem, we present a spatial Markov jump process model of savanna forest fires that integrates key ecological processes, including seed dispersal, fire spread, and non-linear vegetation flammability. In contrast to many models of forest-savanna bistability, we explicitly model both fire dynamics and vegetation regrowth in a mathematically tractable framework. This approach bridges the gap between slow-timescale vegetation models and highly resolved fire dynamics, shedding light on the influence of short-term and transient processes on vegetation cover. In our spatial stochastic model, bistability arises from periodic fires that maintain low forest cover, whereas dense forest areas inhibit fire spread and preserve high tree density. The deterministic mean-field approximation of the model similarly predicts bistability, but deviates quantitatively from the fully spatial model, especially in terms of its transient dynamics. These results also underscore the critical role of timescale separation between fire and vegetation processes in shaping ecosystem structure and resilience.

Indexed as

FiresForestsGrasslandModels, BiologicalClimate ChangeComputer SimulationEcosystemMarkov ChainsMathematical ConceptsSeed DispersalStochastic ProcessesTreesWildfiresBifurcation analysisEcologyMean-field modelsPartial integro-differential equationsSpatial stochastic processesTree-grass coexistence

Identifiers

PMID41787096
PMCPMC12963176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.