Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41787090›Full record

ArticleLab animal2026

GrimACE: automated, multimodal cage-side assessment of pain and well-being in mice.

Oliver Sturman, Marcel Schmutz, Tom Lorimer, Runzhong Zhang, Mattia Privitera, Fabienne K Roessler, Justine Leonardi, Rebecca Waag, Alina-Mariuca Marinescu, Clara Bekemeier and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lab animal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Oliver SturmanLaboratory of Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience, Institute for Neuroscience, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH, Zurich, Switzerland. oliver.sturman@sl.ethz.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6859-4800
Marcel SchmutzLaboratory of Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience, Institute for Neuroscience, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-9464-5855
Tom LorimerLaboratory of Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience, Institute for Neuroscience, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH, Zurich, Switzerland.
Runzhong ZhangLaboratory of Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience, Institute for Neuroscience, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH, Zurich, Switzerland.
Mattia PriviteraLaboratory of Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience, Institute for Neuroscience, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH, Zurich, Switzerland.
Fabienne K RoesslerLaboratory of Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience, Institute for Neuroscience, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH, Zurich, Switzerland.
Justine LeonardiLaboratory of Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience, Institute for Neuroscience, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-3555-5563
Rebecca WaagLaboratory of Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience, Institute for Neuroscience, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH, Zurich, Switzerland.
Alina-Mariuca MarinescuLaboratory of Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience, Institute for Neuroscience, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-4073-0402
Clara BekemeierInstitute of Animal Welfare Animal Behavior and Laboratory Animal Science School of Veterinary Medicine Freie Universitat Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Katharina HohlbaumGerman Centre for the Protection of Laboratory Animals (Bf3R) German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6681-9367
Johannes BohacekLaboratory of Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience, Institute for Neuroscience, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH, Zurich, Switzerland. johannes.bohacek@hest.ethz.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8442-653X

Funding

Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (Swiss National Science Foundation) 310030_204372
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pain and welfare monitoring is essential for ethical animal testing, but current cage-side assessments are qualitative and subjective. Here we present the GrimACE, a fully standardized and automated cage-side monitoring tool for mice, the most widely used animals in research. The GrimACE uses computer vision to provide automated mouse grimace scale (MGS) assessment together with pose estimation in a safe, dark environment. We validated the system by analyzing pain after brain surgeries (craniotomies) with head implants under two analgesia regimes. Human-expert and automated MGS scores showed very high correlation (Pearson's r = 0.87). Both expert and automated scores revealed that a moderate increase in pain can be detected for up to 48 h after surgeries, but that both a single dose of meloxicam (5 mg/kg subcutaneuously) or three doses of buprenorphine (0.1 mg/kg) + meloxicam (5 mg/kg subcutaneuously) provide adequate and comparable pain management. Simultaneous pose estimation demonstrated that mice receiving buprenorphine + meloxicam showed increased movement 4 h after surgery, indicative of hyperactivity, a well-known side effect of opioid treatment. Significant weight loss was also detected in the buprenorphine + meloxicam treatment group compared with the meloxicam-only group. In addition, detailed BehaviorFlow analysis and automated MGS scoring of control animals suggests that habituation to GrimACE is unnecessary, and that measurements can be repeated multiple times, ensuring standardized postoperative recovery monitoring.

Indexed as

Animal WelfarePain MeasurementPostoperative PainAnalgesics, OpioidAnimalsAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalBuprenorphineMaleMeloxicamMiceThiazinesThiazolesAnalgesics, OpioidAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalBuprenorphineMeloxicamThiazinesThiazoles

Identifiers

PMID41787090
PMCPMC13043301

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.