SynthesisSurgical endoscopy2026
Transversus abdominis plane block versus port site anesthetic in adult laparoscopic appendectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Surgical endoscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDespite advances in minimally invasive surgery, pain after appendectomy remains common. The transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block has been proposed as an alternative to port site local anesthetic. We aimed to synthesize randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the efficacy and safety of 1) TAP block versus port site local anesthetic, and 2) ultrasound to laparoscope-guided TAP blocks following adult minimally invasive appendectomy.
methodsRelevant databases were searched for RCTs until December 2024. Two authors independently identified trials, extracted data, assessed risk of bias (ROB 2), and evaluated evidence certainty (GRADE).
resultsFour RCTs (233 patients) were included comparing TAP block to port site anesthetic in laparoscopic appendectomy. No studies examined robotic surgery, and none compared ultrasound to laparoscope-guided technique. TAP block led to decreased total opioid consumption (mean difference: - 4.50 mg morphine equivalents, 95%CI - 6.51, - 2.50, 3 RCTs, 153 patients, low certainty), and reduced pain scores at 4, 6 and 12 h postoperatively, but not at 1 and 2 h, or when pooled across the first 24 h postoperatively (very low certainty). There was no difference in hospital length of stay (mean difference: - 0.03 days, 95%CI: - 0.40, 0.33, 3 RCTs, 177 patients, very low certainty) or postoperative nausea and vomiting (risk ratio: 1.15, 95%CI: 0.77, 1.71, 3 RCTs, 153 patients, low certainty). Patient satisfaction was measured in one study, which favored TAP block. No adverse reactions were reported.
conclusionsCompared to port site injection, TAP block may result in a small improvement in opioid consumption, postoperative pain scores, and patient satisfaction following laparoscopic appendectomy. There appears to be no difference in postoperative nausea and vomiting. The impact on length of stay is unclear and may have limited clinical significance. Evidence certainty was low to very low and based on a small number of RCTs, indicating a need for further research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41787081What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.