Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41787044›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Systemic risk mitigation in supply chains through network rewiring.

Giacomo Zelbi, Leonardo Niccolò Ialongo, Stefan Thurner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Giacomo ZelbiComplexity Science Hub Vienna, 1030, Vienna, Austria.
Leonardo Niccolò IalongoComplexity Science Hub Vienna, 1030, Vienna, Austria.
Stefan ThurnerComplexity Science Hub Vienna, 1030, Vienna, Austria. stefan.thurner@meduniwien.ac.at.

Funding

Austrian Federal Minister of Economy, Energy, and Tourism Wi-2023-37526/3-EAustrian Science Fund 10.55776/EFP5
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The networked nature of supply chains makes them susceptible to systemic risk, where local firm failures can propagate through interdependencies and lead to cascading supply chain disruptions. The systemic risk of supply chains can be quantified and is closely related to the topology and dynamics of supply chain networks (SCN). However, how different network topologies contribute to this risk remains unclear. Here, we ask whether systemic risk can be significantly reduced by rewiring supplier-customer pairs. In doing so, we quantify the extent to which the observed systemic risk is a result of fundamental properties of the dynamical system. We minimize systemic risk by employing a method from statistical physics that respects firm-level constraints to production. Analyzing six specific subnetworks of the national SCNs of Ecuador and Hungary, we demonstrate that systemic risk can be considerably mitigated by 16-50% without reducing the production output of firms. A comparison of network properties before and after rewiring reveals that this risk reduction is achieved by changing the connectivity in non-trivial ways. These results suggest that actual SCN topologies carry unnecessarily high levels of systemic risk and that resilience can be substantially enhanced by targeted supplier changes comparable in scale to one year of natural network evolution.

Indexed as

Monte Carlo simulationProduction networksResilienceSupply chain rewiringSystemic risk

Identifiers

PMID41787044
PMCPMC13079837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.