Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41787026›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2026

The use of virtual reality to improve quality of recovery in women undergoing gynecological surgeries: a randomized controlled trial.

Jason Ju In Chan, Rehena Sultana, Yu Theng Rachel Ho, Muna Hamed Said Al Malki, Chin Wen Tan, Ban Leong Sng

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03685422 (The Use of Preoperative Virtual Reality to Reduce Anxiety and Pain on Gynaecologic Patients Undergoing Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03685422 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

The Use of Preoperative Virtual Reality to Reduce Anxiety and Pain on Gynaecologic Patients Undergoing Surgery

TypeinterventionalSponsorKK Women's and Children's HospitalRan2019 to 2027Enrolled220ConditionsPain, Postoperative, AnxietyArmsVirtual Reality
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jason Ju In ChanDepartment of Women's Anesthesia, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, 100 Bukit Timah Road, Singapore, 229899, Singapore.
Rehena SultanaCentre for Quantitative Medicine, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.
Yu Theng Rachel HoDuke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.
Muna Hamed Said Al MalkiDepartment of Women's Anesthesia, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, 100 Bukit Timah Road, Singapore, 229899, Singapore.
Chin Wen TanDepartment of Women's Anesthesia, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, 100 Bukit Timah Road, Singapore, 229899, Singapore. tan.chin.wen@kkh.com.sg.
Ban Leong SngDepartment of Women's Anesthesia, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, 100 Bukit Timah Road, Singapore, 229899, Singapore.

Funding

Academic Medicine - Enhancing Training, Healthcare, Outcomes and Standards (AM-ETHOS) Duke-NUS Medical Student Research Fellowship Award year 2024-25 AM-ETHOS01/FY2024/17-A17SingHealth Duke-NUS Academic Medicine (AM) Research Grant AM/SU065/2022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Virtual reality (VR) is an emerging non-pharmacological intervention that has shown promise in reducing anxiety and pain, but its effect on post-operative recovery is less studied. We assessed the use of VR on postoperative recovery, anxiety, and pain in women undergoing gynecological surgery. This was a randomized controlled trial that recruited women undergoing gynecological surgery. Patients were randomized into two groups: no intervention; or VR calming scenarios with meditation and breathing exercises administered perioperatively. The primary outcome would measure the quality of recovery through the Quality of Recovery-40 (QoR-40) total scores at postoperative 24 h. Secondary outcomes included the perioperative visual analog scale-anxiety (VAS-A) scores, pain scores, and analgesic use. A total of 104 participants were randomized equally into the VR and control groups with no dropout. The VR group showed significantly greater QoR-40 total scores at postoperative 24 h (mean difference (MD) 7.23, 95% CI 1.44-13.02, p = 0.015), with notable improvements in physical comfort (MD 2.58, p = 0.015), and pain (MD 1.38, p = 0.005) dimensions when compared with control group. Anxiety scores were significantly lower in the VR group during preoperative period (MD 0.96, p = 0.034), and at postoperative 48 (MD 0.89, p = 0.01) and 72 h (MD 0.66, p = 0.03). Patient satisfaction with VR was high, with > 40% of patients reporting satisfaction of "good" or "excellent". VR significantly improved postoperative recovery scores at 24 h and was associated with reduced anxiety, pain, and analgesic use. While the improvements were statistically significant, the clinical relevance of the recovery score difference remains uncertain. These findings support the potential role of VR as a non-pharmacological adjunct to enhance recovery in gynecological surgery.Trial registration: This study was registered on clinicaltrials.gov registry (NCT03685422) with date of first registration on 24/09/2018.

Indexed as

Gynecologic Surgical ProceduresVirtual RealityAdultAnxietyFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPain MeasurementPostoperative PainAnxietyPainQuality of recoveryVirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID41787026
PMCPMC13079731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.