ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2026
Radiographic detection of retained neuropatties in the paranasal sinuses: a cadaveric diagnostic accuracy study.
Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRetained surgical materials are a preventable source of postoperative complications. This study evaluates the radiographic detectability of retained neuropatties in the paranasal sinuses to support safer postoperative imaging and surgical practice.
methodsSixteen previously dissected cadaveric heads were labeled and assigned to predefined sinonasal or nasopharyngeal site using an allocation table (e.g., frontal sinus anterior table, maxillary sinus, sphenoid sinus floor, nasal cavity, nasopharynx). For each head–site combination, a large neuropatty (1 × 3 in) was first inserted and imaged with anteroposterior and lateral digital radiographs, then removed and replaced by a small neuropatty (1/2 × 1/2 in) with repeat imaging, followed by anteroposterior and lateral radiographs without a neuropatty in place. This protocol yielded 32 images with large neuropatties, 32 with small neuropatties, and 32 without neuropatties (96 radiographs in total) for blinded interpretation by three neuroradiologists and subsequent diagnostic accuracy analysis.
resultsThere was substantial inter- and intra-rater reliability for neuropatty detection, with Fleiss’ κ values ranging from 0.67 to 0.78, and agreement with the previously established distribution of neuropatty locations was similarly high (κ = 0.61–0.82). Sensitivity and specificity for small neuropatties were 0.43 and 0.80 in AP views, respectively, and 0.68 and 0.93 in lateral views, respectively. Larger neuropatties yielded higher sensitivity (0.62 in AP and 0.78 in lateral views) with comparable specificities. Detection remained poor in anatomically complex regions, particularly the sphenoid sinus and nasopharynx, where sensitivities were as low as 0.00–0.17 in some views.
conclusionRadiologic accuracy is greater for larger neuropatties and lateral views but remains limited in anatomically complex regions, such as the sphenoid sinus and nasopharynx.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41786945What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.