ArticleScientific reports2026
25-Hydroxyvitamin D
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Vitamin D supports musculoskeletal health, including bone mineral density and skeletal muscle function. Vitamin D₃ (VitD3, cholecalciferol) is an inactive form which requires two enzymatic hydroxylation steps, from VitD₃ to 25-hydroxyvitamin D₃ (25OHD₃, calcifediol) in liver and then to active form 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (1,25(OH)2D3, calcitriol) in kidney. Vitamin D status is determined by circulating 25OHD levels. Compared with VitD3, calcifediol bypasses the hepatic 25-hydroxylation step and is more hydrophilic, resulting in higher bioavailability and less sequestration in adipose tissue. Previous studies have linked both VitD₃ and 25OHD₃ to muscle mass, strength or atrophy markers, but their effects on skeletal muscle fiber-type composition remains unclear. We hypothesize that dietary 25OHD₃ versus VitD₃ differentially modulates skeletal muscle fiber composition during postnatal growth. Three-week-old male rats were fed a VitD₃–deficient diet for 4 weeks and then assigned for 4 weeks to diets that were deficient or replete with VitD₃ or 25OHD₃. Relative to VitD₃ repletion, 25OHD₃ repletion increased the proportion of slow-twitch type I fibers and decreased fast type IIb fibers in the bicep femoris, without altering muscle mass. This shift was accompanied by higher mitochondrial DNA copy number. Transcriptomic profiling indicated enrichment of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) and calcium signaling pathways, including genes in vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 (VEGFR2) and nitric oxide synthase (NOS) pathways and inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate kinase (IP3K). These data suggest that, following early-life vitamin D deficiency, dietary 25OHD₃ preferentially promotes slow-oxidative fiber transition compared with VitD₃, and is associated with transcriptional enrichment of ERK- and calcium-dependent signaling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.