ArticleScientific reports2026
GC-IMS-based analysis of serum volatile organic compounds for diagnosis of gastric cancer.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Volatile organic compound profiling by HS-GC-IMS for vaginal infection identification.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Gastric cancer detection remains challenging due to the lack of noninvasive early diagnostic tools. This study investigates profiling of serum volatile organic compounds (VOCs) using gas chromatography-ion mobility spectrometry (GC-IMS) for gastric cancer screening. Serum samples were obtained from 277 participants, including 123 patients with gastric cancer, 38 patients with precancerous diseases (PD), and 116 healthy controls (HC). In the model development group, Kruskal-Wallis tests showed that the levels of 19 VOCs differed significantly among gastric cancer, PD, and HC groups (p < 0.05). Based on the VOCs that differed significantly, a support vector machine (SVM) model achieved the best performance among the six models tested. Using importance ranking and forward selection, 11 VOCs were selected for the final model, achieving 96.4% accuracy in the validation set and 92.9% in an independent test set, showing higher diagnostic accuracy than the traditional tumor marker carcinoembryonic antigen. The model also achieved 100% sensitivity and > 90% specificity for detecting early gastric cancer in both the validation and test sets. Collectively, our findings suggest that GC-IMS-based serum VOC profiling may offer a potential noninvasive approach for gastric cancer detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.