ArticleScientific reports2026
Reference intervals for peripheral blood neutrophil CD64 index and monocyte HLA-DR in healthy adults.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reference intervals for peripheral blood neutrophil CD64 index and monocyte HLA-DR in healthy adults.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Editorial: Acute pancreatitis infection: epidemiology, prevention, clinical characteristics, treatment, and prediction, volume II.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Neutrophil CD64 (nCD64) index and Monocyte HLA-DR (mHLADR) played an important role in the diagnosis of infection, however, reference intervals for these parameters in healthy adults remain insufficiently defined. This study aimed to established reference intervals for nCD64 index and mHLADR% in the peripheral blood from 285 healthy adults. All the subjects were grouped into subgroups according to sex (male and female) and age (20–51 years, 51–90 years). The analyses indicated age to be an important factor associated with changes in nCD64 index, which gradually increased from 20 to 90 years and showed a positive correlation with age (P < 0.0001). In contrast, no significant differences in mHLA-DR% were observed across gender or age groups (p > 0.05). Furthermore, no correlation was found between nCD64 index or mHLA-DR% and all the inflammatory derived indicators of blood routine (P > 0.05). In conclusion, the reference intervals established for the nCD64 index and mHLA-DR% in healthy adults may provide supportive information for monitoring immune status in the context of infectious diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.