ArticleScientific reports2026
A unified framework for correcting batch effects and integrating multi-omics data.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Emerging insights into CC and CXC chemokines and their receptors in Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection.FEBS open bio · 2026Review
- Inflammasome-associated pyroptosis and tumor angiogenesis in prostate cancer.Iranian journal of basic medical sciences · 2026Review
- Exposome influences: a multi-omics perspective on the combined toxic effects of pharmaceuticals and personal care products in Alzheimer's disease.Frontiers in toxicology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Multi-omics studies enable a comprehensive understanding of biological systems by integrating complementary molecular layers such as gene expression, DNA methylation, and chromatin accessibility. However, the generation of multi-omics data remains costly and labor-intensive, leading researchers to combine publicly available datasets collected from different cohorts, laboratories, and platforms. Integrating such heterogeneous datasets introduces substantial batch effects and technical variability that can obscure true biological structure. While numerous batch correction methods exist for single-omics data, systematic approaches for multi-omics batch effect correction remain limited. Correcting each omics layer independently risks disrupting cross-omics concordance and fails to ensure that samples are aligned within a unified multi-modal space, underscoring the need for coordinated, modality-aware harmonization that preserves shared molecular structure while removing technical variation across studies. To address this gap, we developed MoDAmix, a unified framework that leverages domain adaptation to remove technical variation while preserving shared molecular structure across omics layers. In particular, MoDAmix aligns feature distributions across batches and modalities through adversarial learning, enforcing consistency both within and between omics types to achieve coherent cross-omics integration. MoDAmix proceeds through four stages: (1) pre-training to learn initial feature representations, (2) adversarial adaptation to reduce batch effects within each omics type, (3) multi-omics adversarial alignment to harmonize modalities in a shared latent space, and (4) semi-supervised class alignment to refine subtype separability through pseudo-labeling and centroid consistency. Evaluations on both single-cell and bulk datasets-including mouse brain (gene expression and chromatin accessibility) and cancer cohorts (gene expression and DNA methylation)-demonstrated that MoDAmix effectively mitigates batch effects, improves clustering and classification performance, and preserves subtype structure across domains. Together, these results highlight MoDAmix as a robust framework for multi-omics batch effect correction and integration, enabling reliable cross-cohort analysis in systems biology and precision medicine. MoDAmix is publicly available at https://github.com/cbi-bioinfo/MoDAmix.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.