ArticleScientific reports2026
A comprehensive evaluation of lightweight deep learning models for tomato disease classification on edge computing environments.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Deep convolutional neural network-based automated identification and classification of mungbean foliar diseases.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To achieve agricultural automation, deep learning applications for early and accurate disease detection in tomato plants have been extensively developed. However, there is a fundamental trade-off between computational efficiency and diagnostic accuracy in resource-constrained agricultural edge environments. This paper proposes an evaluation framework for seven architectures that represent standard, efficient, and hybrid CNN structures to assess their implementation potential. Through evaluations of explainability, computational efficiency, and diagnostic performance, seven lightweight architectures (ShuffleNetV2, MobileNetV3-Small, SqueezeNet, MobilePlantViT, DenseNet121, ResNet50, and VGG16) are thoroughly examined. Three significant findings are derived from experiments conducted on a subset of tomato diseases in the PlantVillage dataset. First, the MobilePlantViT architecture accurately strikes the ideal balance between efficiency and performance. Second, in order to quantitatively assess the explainability of XAI models (Grad-CAM, SHAP, and LIME) and identify the best option for edge devices, we propose the perturbation stability score (PSS) metric. Third, we test CPU inference measurements to better reflect the actual scenario and find that the hybrid design effectively leverages parallel computing. According to these findings, MobilePlantViT is the ideal architecture for applications that require operation on edge devices with limited resources and achieve high diagnosis accuracy (above 99.5%).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.