Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41786827›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Weighted cost emission dispatch optimization using GA-APO hybridization under priority sensitive scheduling for thermal power systems.

Chodagam Srinivas, M Rama Prasad Reddy, Vineet Kumar, Vineet Kumar, Ark Dev, Negasa Muleta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Chodagam SrinivasDepartment of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Madanapalle Institute of Technology & Science, Madanapalle, Andhra Pradesh, India.
M Rama Prasad ReddyDepartment of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, G. Pullaiah College of Engineering and Technology, Kurnool, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Vineet KumarDepartment of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Madanapalle Institute of Technology & Science, Madanapalle, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Vineet KumarDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Netaji Subhas University of Technology, Dwarka, New Delhi, India.
Ark DevDepartment of Electronics and Communication Engineering, SR University, Warangal, Telangana, 506371, India.
Negasa MuletaCentre of Electrical System and Electronics, College of Electrical Engineering and Computing, Adama Science and Technology University, Adama, Ethiopia. negasa.muleta@astu.edu.et.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modern utilities operate in an environment where fuel expenditure cannot be viewed in isolation from the environmental impact of generation. This creates a scheduling problem that is harder to address with traditional single objective tools, especially when the fuel and emission characteristics of thermal units do not behave smoothly. In this work, a two-stage solution strategy is developed for the economic-emission dispatch problem. The idea is straightforward: use a Genetic Algorithm (GA) to search widely for feasible production patterns and then pass its best candidate to an Arctic Puffin Optimization (APO) based refinement step, which adjusts the schedule locally and attempts to settle it closer to a desirable operating point. The economic and environmental indices are combined through a weighted formulation so that the dispatch can be steered toward cost saving, emission reduction, or an intermediate compromise without reworking the underlying model. Proposed method is tested on three generators thermal power plant with 24 h scheduling. Under different conditions, the proposed algorithm performed satisfactory by maintaining the results within the operational limits. Comparative study validates the effectiveness of the proposed design over GA approach. In cost-priority operation the hybrid approach achieves up to 1.88% reduction in total operating cost compared to GA. In emission priority condition the proposed GA-APO reduced the emission consumption nearly 0.21% and in balanced case cost per MWh reduced nearly 0.68%.

Indexed as

Arctic puffin optimization (APO)Cost–emission trade-offForecasted load managementLoad scenario analysisPriority-based dispatch strategy

Identifiers

PMID41786827
PMCPMC13077088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.