Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41786820›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Integrated source apportionment, co-enrichment mechanisms analysis, and risk assessment of arsenic and fluoride in groundwater of large-scale irrigation districts in semi-arid regions.

Qiying Zhang, Aihui Wei, Panpan Xu, Hui Qian, Jianxi Ren

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Qiying ZhangSchool of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Xi'an University of Science and Technology, Xi'an, 710054, Shaanxi, China. zhangqiying@xust.edu.cn.
Aihui WeiSchool of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Xi'an University of Science and Technology, Xi'an, 710054, Shaanxi, China.
Panpan XuSchool of Water and Environment, Chang'an University, Xi'an, 710054, Shaanxi, China.
Hui QianSchool of Water and Environment, Chang'an University, Xi'an, 710054, Shaanxi, China.
Jianxi RenSchool of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Xi'an University of Science and Technology, Xi'an, 710054, Shaanxi, China.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 42302292Open Fund of Key Laboratory of Subsurface Hydrology and Ecological Effect in Arid Region of the Ministry of Education, CHD 300102295508Outstanding Youth Program of Xi 'an University of Science and Technology 2024YQ3-06
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To address the widespread concern of arsenic (As) and fluoride (F) contamination in irrigated areas, this study analyzed 51 groundwater samples from the Jiaokou Irrigation District, China. An integrated approach of isotope tracing (δD and δ18O) and self-organizing map (SOM) was used to reveal the spatial distribution and enrichment mechanisms of As and F. Health risks were further evaluated via Monte Carlo simulation. The results indicated that groundwater in the study area was weakly alkaline brackish water. The groundwater was classified into three hydrochemical types: Cl·SO4-Na, HCO3-Na, and HCO3-Ca by SOM cluster analysis. Weakly alkaline conditions inhibited As adsorption onto minerals (hematite, goethite) and fluorite precipitation, while promoting OH⁻ substitution for F⁻ in F-bearing minerals (biotite, amphibole), thereby facilitating the co-enrichment of As and F. Dissolution of feldspathic silicates increased water-rock interaction time and further enhanced alkalinity. Meanwhile, strong evaporation-concentration processes and agricultural activities contributed to As-F co-enrichment in groundwater. Overall, F posed a greater non-carcinogenic risk than As, with children being more susceptible. For carcinogenic risk, adults were the more sensitive group to arsenic. Specifically, F was the major contributor to non-carcinogenic risks for both adults (62.2%) and children (59.6%). As, however, showed higher sensitivity for carcinogenic risk in adults (92.6%). Management priorities should include safeguarding drinking water for children in high-risk areas and controlling groundwater fluoride within agricultural water strategies. These findings provide a scientific foundation for mitigating health risks and ensuring sustainable groundwater use in semi-arid irrigation districts.

Indexed as

arsenic-fluoride groundwaterco-enrichment mechanismshealth risk assessmentintegrated source apportionmentself-organizing map (SOM)

Identifiers

PMID41786820
PMCPMC13044312

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.