ArticleNPJ science of food2026
Matcha alleviates sneezing response in a murine model of allergic rhinitis.
Article in NPJ science of food, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Matcha, a traditional Japanese tea, has been implicated in various health effects. Herein, we investigated the impact of Matcha on allergic rhinitis by employing an allergen-induced nasal inflammation model in mice. Allergen-induced immediate nasal response, represented by the evocation of sneezing in ovalbumin-immunized mice, and subsequent nasal hyperresponsiveness, assessed by enhanced histamine-triggered sneezes, were significantly suppressed by continuous intragastric administration of hot water-extracted Matcha (250 mg/kg) with its residue. However, accumulation of inflammatory cells, total and allergen-specific IgE production, and intestinal microbiota diversity were unaffected by Matcha. Histamine- and substance P-triggered sneezes, accompanied by c-Fos expression in relevant neurons, tended to be suppressed by Matcha, whereas anti-dinitrophenyl IgE-evoked passive cutaneous anaphylaxis was unaffected. T cell receptor-stimulated CD4
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.