ReviewNature reviews. Disease primers2026
Ovarian cancer.
Review in Nature reviews. Disease primers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fagotti Score (FS) Compared with Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI) for Preoperative Assessment of Optimal Cytoreduction in Upfront Laparoscopy.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Article
- Heterogeneity of Ex Vivo Tumor Responses in Ovarian Cancer Tissues.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Article
- TAMs in the Gynecological Tumor Microenvironment: Insights from Cross-Cancer Studies for Immunotherapy.Cancers · 2026Review
- PARP16 is a Druggable Regulator of Ribosome MARylation and Protein Homeostasis in Ovarian Cancer Cells.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Rising Ovarian Cancer Burden in Africa, 2009-2023: Epidemiological Change, Age-Specific Patterns, COVID-19-Related Deviations, and Future Forecasts.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
- Advancing the frontiers of ovarian cancer therapy: a comprehensive synthesis of emerging cell death paradigms.Oncology reviews · 2026Review
- Multimodal AI in high-grade serous ovarian cancer: integrated prediction and clinical decision-making.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Macrophage polarization in gynecologic malignancies: key signaling pathways and clinical perspectives.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) describes a group of diseases characterized by differing pathogeneses, molecular profiles, histologies and prognoses. The low incidence of each distinct histological type of EOC poses challenges for obtaining an accurate diagnosis, robust evidence to guide management, and a mechanistic understanding to ensure availability of effective therapies. Most EOCs, including high-grade serous ovarian cancer, predominantly originate from the fimbriated ends of the fallopian tube, whereas low-grade serous, clear cell, endometrioid and mucinous EOCs are thought to originate from other tissues. Despite recognized genetic susceptibilities for the disease, no effective screening is available and late-stage diagnosis remains common. Known genetic susceptibilities are addressed by risk reduction surgery including removal of both fallopian tubes and both ovaries. Management is predominantly based on adequate surgery and chemotherapy with carboplatin and paclitaxel, with the addition of anti-angiogenic therapy as indicated. The incorporation of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors into first-line therapy has considerably altered outcomes in some women with EOC who have defective homologous recombination DNA repair, including in those with BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 mutations. Other molecular characteristics are important in distinct types of EOC, but the use of matched targeted therapies remains under investigation, as does the role of immunotherapy for EOC, for which trial data have been disappointing to date. Translationally enriched clinical trials will be important to further explore and validate accurate biomarkers to better guide clinical care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41786760What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.