Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41786760›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Disease primers2026

Ovarian cancer.

Clare L Scott, Susana Banerjee, Florence Joly, Jung-Min Lee, Asima Mukhopadhyay, David S Tan, Elise C Kohn

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Disease primers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Clare L Scott *Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, Victoria, Australia. scottc@wehi.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3689-5956
Susana BanerjeeThe Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8840-7934
Florence JolyMedical Oncology Department, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6168-4942
Jung-Min LeeNational Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1280-5909
Asima MukhopadhyayKolkata Gynecological Oncology Trials and Translational Research Group, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0761-9562
David S TanDepartment of Haematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9087-5262
Elise C Kohn *National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA. kohne@mail.nih.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8631-9762

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) describes a group of diseases characterized by differing pathogeneses, molecular profiles, histologies and prognoses. The low incidence of each distinct histological type of EOC poses challenges for obtaining an accurate diagnosis, robust evidence to guide management, and a mechanistic understanding to ensure availability of effective therapies. Most EOCs, including high-grade serous ovarian cancer, predominantly originate from the fimbriated ends of the fallopian tube, whereas low-grade serous, clear cell, endometrioid and mucinous EOCs are thought to originate from other tissues. Despite recognized genetic susceptibilities for the disease, no effective screening is available and late-stage diagnosis remains common. Known genetic susceptibilities are addressed by risk reduction surgery including removal of both fallopian tubes and both ovaries. Management is predominantly based on adequate surgery and chemotherapy with carboplatin and paclitaxel, with the addition of anti-angiogenic therapy as indicated. The incorporation of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors into first-line therapy has considerably altered outcomes in some women with EOC who have defective homologous recombination DNA repair, including in those with BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 mutations. Other molecular characteristics are important in distinct types of EOC, but the use of matched targeted therapies remains under investigation, as does the role of immunotherapy for EOC, for which trial data have been disappointing to date. Translationally enriched clinical trials will be important to further explore and validate accurate biomarkers to better guide clinical care.

Indexed as

Ovarian NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialFemaleHumansPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID41786760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.