ArticleSleep2026
Modeling the effects of flight itinerary on jetlag duration.
Article in Sleep, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
STUDY
objectivesJetlag affects millions of travelers daily, yet influences of flight schedules on circadian disruption remain unclear. We aimed to quantify the effects of flight itinerary on jetlag duration at the group-average level and to identify underlying physiological mechanisms.
methodsWe used biophysical modeling to analyze how flight departure and duration times impacted jetlag across 55 296 simulated flights. Simulated flights spanned time zone differences, ΔT, from -12 to 12 h and departed between 00:30 and 24:00 with durations from 0.5 to 24 h. Two cases were compared: (1) free sleep and (2) forced wakefulness during daytime at the destination. In-flight sleep followed the physiological need for sleep.
resultsFlight itineraries affected jetlag duration for all ΔTs and determined the direction of circadian adaptation for a subset of ΔTs depending on behavior at the destination. The highest variability of jetlag duration was observed for ΔT >0 h, peaking at ΔT = 9 h. Overall, for 1 ≤ ΔT ≤ 9 h, jetlag was shortest for flights departing or arriving around habitual wake time and longest when departing or arriving near habitual sleep onset. When in-flight sleep was restricted, the shortest jetlag for these ΔTs was instead observed for flights arriving during the circadian day. This pattern reversed for other ΔTs.
conclusionsFlight departure and arrival times contribute to the variability of jetlag duration and can reverse the direction of circadian adaptation post-flight. These dynamics are mainly governed by light exposure and sleep timing during and around flights. Statement of Significance This study provides a quantitative analysis of how flight itineraries interact with circadian and sleep physiology to determine jetlag duration. By simulating over 55 000 flights across all time zone transitions, we reveal systematic patterns linking flight timing with adaptation time and the opportunities to minimize circadian disruption through itinerary design and behaviors during and around flights. These findings advance the mechanistic understanding of jetlag and offer actionable insights for travelers and airlines to reduce jetlag impact through optimized flight schedules and personalized strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.