Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41786625›Full record

ReviewJournal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS2026

Enhancing Rodent Welfare, Cost Savings, and Efficiency: Implementation and Review of Data-Driven Improvements.

Kerith R Luchins, Jessica L Felgenhauer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kerith R LuchinsAnimal Resources Center and Department of Surgery, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Jessica L FelgenhauerAnimal Resources Center and Department of Surgery, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

At the University of Chicago, we have implemented multiple practical, data-driven 3Rs (replacement, reduction, refinement) strategies to improve rodent welfare over the past 5 years. As there are limited publications that outline an institutional approach, this work reviews the enhancements in animal welfare and operational practices implemented in our rodent program, offering a resource and reference for other institutions. These measures encompass the use of environmental health monitoring for both colony and quarantine surveillance and housing modifications, as well as advancements in enrichment, including nesting and structural options, adoption of mouse-preferred bedding substrate, and housing room temperature modifications to better support the thermoregulatory needs of the mice. In addition, we implemented cage change modifications, which include a scent transfer and reduced cage change frequency. Finally, the use of animal handling improvements at our institution includes refined handling techniques and transport cart modifications. Ultimately, we have been successful at improving animal welfare while also implementing cost savings and efficiency improvements.

Indexed as

3Rs, replacement, reduction, refinementDCS, direct colony samplingEDT, exhaust dust testingEHM, environmental health monitoringSFSB, sentinel-free soiled beddingUChicago, University of Chicago

Identifiers

PMID41786625
PMCPMC13086197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.