Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41786604›Full record

ArticleGenome research2026

Minimizing reference bias with an imputed personalized reference.

Kavya Vaddadi, Mao-Jan Lin, Sina Majidian, Taher Mun, Ben Langmead

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Integer programming framework for pangenome-based genome inference.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kavya VaddadiDepartment of Computer Science, Whiting School of Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9020-2666
Mao-Jan LinDepartment of Computer Science, Whiting School of Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1860-7786
Sina MajidianDepartment of Computer Science, Whiting School of Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5345-6982
Taher MunDepartment of Computer Science, Whiting School of Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3588-0883
Ben LangmeadDepartment of Computer Science, Whiting School of Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218, USA langmea@cs.jhu.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-2437-1976

Funding

Methods for sequencing data analysis and archive-scale data science - RenewalR35GM139602 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Benjamin Thomas Langmead · 2021 to 2026
$5.0M
Personal and panel references for improved alignmentR01HG011392 · NHGRI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI LANGMEAD, BENJAMIN THOMAS · 2020 to 2025
$4.2M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG011392NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM139602NSF OAC 1920103
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pangenome indexes reduce reference bias in sequencing data analysis. However, bias can be reduced further by using a personalized reference, for example, a diploid human reference constructed to match a donor individual's alleles. Here, we present a new impute-first alignment framework that combines elements of genotype imputation and read alignment. We first genotype the individual using a subsample of the input reads. Using a reference panel and an efficient imputation algorithm, we impute a personalized diploid reference. Finally, we index the personalized reference and apply a read aligner (either linear or graph) to align the full read set to the personalized reference. On the HG002 sample, this framework achieves a higher variant-calling F1-score (99.77%) compared with the traditional linear aligner (99.62%), graph pangenome aligner (99.72%), and graph personalized-pangenome aligner (99.75%), with substantial reduction in the number of errors (38.73% vs. a linear aligner, 14.97% vs. a graph aligner, and 6.05% vs. a personalized graph). An imputed reference can have comparable efficiency to a pangenome reference, making it an overall advantageous choice for whole-genome DNA sequencing experiments. Advantages of our impute-first approach include that (1) it fully considers linkage disequilibrium and produces a phased diploid reference as an output; (2) it produces accurate personalized references even from low-coverage data; and (3) it is compatible with both graph and linear reference representations, achieving its highest variant-calling F1 accuracy using a standard linear aligner (BWA-MEM).

Indexed as

Genome, HumanSequence AlignmentSequence Analysis, DNAAlgorithmsAllelesDiploidyGenotypeHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansPolymorphism, Single NucleotideReference StandardsSoftware

Identifiers

PMID41786604
PMCPMC13138014

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.