Observational studyRMD open2026
Effectiveness of TNF inhibitors in patients with very early axial spondyloarthritis, defined as duration of ≤1 year of back pain: longitudinal observational data from the SCQM registry.
Observational study in RMD open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- In search of a window of opportunity in axial spondyloarthritis: treatment outcomes across different symptom durations.EULAR rheumatology open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo characterise patients with 'very early' axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), defined as a duration ≤1 year of back pain and to determine the effectiveness of a first tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) in very early versus established axSpA in a large observational registry.
methodsWe included a total of 3324 patients with axSpA from the Swiss Clinical Quality Management in Rheumatic Diseases registry with available data on duration of back pain (≤1 year=very early axSpA, n=441; >1 year and ≤2 years=early axSpA, n=218; >2 years=established axSpA, n=2575). A first TNFi was started in 31%, 38% and 36% of patients with very early, early and established axSpA. Adjusted logistic regression models were used to compare the probability of achieving low disease activity status according to the Axial Spondyloarthritis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS <2.1) at 1 year. Drug survival was analysed with multiple-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models. Missing data were handled using multiple imputation by chained equations.
resultsObjective signs of inflammation were more prevalent in very early disease. No difference was found regarding the achievement of ASDAS <2.1 after adjustment for age, sex, human leucocyte antigen-B27 status, education, body mass index, smoking, ASDAS and sacroiliac inflammation on MRI (OR 1.08, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.68 in very early vs established axSpA). Similarly, no significant difference in TNFi retention was found in very early versus established axSpA (HR for drug discontinuation 1.05, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.31).
conclusionWe found no evidence for a better effectiveness of TNFi in patients with very early versus established axSpA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.