Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41786451›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2026

Efficacy of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation on early mobilisation in patients undergoing unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Xin Luo, Yuxuan Qi, Zhe Ma, Yan Li, Li-Xin An

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xin LuoDepartment of Anesthesiology, Capital Medical University Affiliated Beijing Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yuxuan QiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Capital Medical University Affiliated Beijing Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-7295-8993
Zhe MaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Capital Medical University Affiliated Beijing Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yan LiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Capital Medical University Affiliated Beijing Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.
Li-Xin AnDepartment of Anesthesiology, Capital Medical University Affiliated Beijing Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China anlixin8120@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly mobilisation represents a core element of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) and is recommended after minimally invasive spine surgery including unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE). However, strategies to facilitate early mobilisation after UBE remain limited. Transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation (TEAS) may improve postoperative pain and recovery after spine surgery, but available evidence in UBE remains inconclusive.

objectiveTo investigate whether perioperative TEAS enhances postoperative recovery after UBE.

methodsThis single-centre randomised controlled trial with blinded assessors will enrol 114 patients undergoing elective UBE discectomy. Participants will be randomly allocated (1:1) by simple randomisation to receive stimulation via self-adhesive electrodes, either single-session TEAS at Neiguan, Dazhui, Chengshan and Sanyinjiao initiated 30 min before surgery until the end of the procedure using a disperse-dense waveform (2/100 Hz) with individualised intensity (10-15 mA) or sham stimulation applied at four non-meridian, non-acupoint sites with brief initial stimulation followed by 0 mA output. Standardised general anaesthesia with bispectral index and analgesia nociception index monitoring will be provided following ERAS recommendations. The primary outcome is successful ambulation rate at 6 hour postoperatively; baseline pain, nausea, quality of recovery and functional status will be assessed using the Numerical Rating Scale, Visual Analogue Scale, Quality of Recovery-15 questionnaire, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score at baseline before intervention while postoperative pain, nausea and vomiting, opioid consumption and Quality of recovery will be evaluated at 6, 24 and 48 hours after surgery, with ODI and JOA assessed during longer-term follow-up and surgery-related adverse events monitored postoperatively. Continuous outcomes will be analysed using parametric (repeated-measures analysis of variance) or non-parametric (Mann-Whitney U) tests, and categorical variables using χ² or Fisher's exact tests. ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS AND DISSEMINATION: This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Beijing Friendship Hospital (No: 2024-P2-087-01) and registered with Chinese Clinical Trial Registry. Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR2400083344.

Indexed as

Acupuncture PointsDiskectomyEarly AmbulationEndoscopyPostoperative PainTranscutaneous Electric Nerve StimulationAdultFemaleHumansMiddle AgedRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAnaesthesia in orthopaedicsElectric Stimulation TherapyOrthopaedic & trauma surgeryPAIN MANAGEMENT

Identifiers

PMID41786451
PMCPMC12970121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.