ArticleThe Lancet. Oncology2026
Cardiac radiosensitivity in the era of thoracic chemoradiotherapy and immunotherapy: a scoping review.
Article in The Lancet. Oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Myositis induced by immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy].Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie · 2026Review
- Review
- MR-Guided Adaptive Radiotherapy in Lung Cancer: Current Landscape and Future Directions.Cancers · 2026Review
- Three-Discipline Collaborative Radiation Therapy (3DCRT) debate: Medical physics should focus less on geometric precision and more on biological outcomes.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
- An analysis of heart failure among cancer patients in the United States between 1999 and 2020.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) consolidation is now the standard of care for unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and is increasingly applied to other thoracic malignancies. Although survival outcomes have improved, concerns about cardiac toxicity have emerged, as both chemoradiotherapy and ICIs are independently cardiotoxic and their combined effects remain unclear. This scoping review first examines chemoradiotherapy-associated and ICI-associated cardiac toxicity separately, and then evaluates their convergence in combined chemoradiotherapy and ICI therapy. For this examination and evaluation, we draw on ten clinical studies, two reviews, and five preclinical reports that together address six key questions: (1) does ICI add cardiac risks to chemoradiotherapy, (2) does previous radiotherapy increase cardiac risks with ICI, (3) does ICI alter the radiosensitivity of cardiac subregions, (4) how should cardiac endpoints be defined, (5) can molecular or pharmacological interventions mitigate toxicity, and (6) what are the major risk factors and management strategies? We also highlight four major gaps: extension beyond NSCLC, long-term survivorship, the potential of advanced radiotherapy techniques, and the interplay between lymphopenia and cardiotoxicity. The convergence of chemoradiotherapy and ICIs represents a new cardiac risk profile. Addressing these questions through larger, long-term studies is essential to balance oncological efficacy with cardiovascular safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.