Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41785878›Full record

ArticleDrug testing and analysis2026

Neural Network-Based Detection of Adulterants in Opioid Samples Using IR Absorption Spectroscopy.

Joshua Jai, Lea Gozdzialski, Bruce Wallace, Chris G Gill, Dennis Hore

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug testing and analysis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Joshua JaiDepartment of Chemistry, University of Victoria, Victoria, Canada.
Lea GozdzialskiDepartment of Chemistry, University of Victoria, Victoria, Canada.
Bruce WallaceSchool of Social Work, University of Victoria, Victoria, Canada.
Chris G GillDepartment of Chemistry, University of Victoria, Victoria, Canada.
Dennis HoreDepartment of Chemistry, University of Victoria, Victoria, Canada.

Funding

Ministry of Health, British ColumbiaNew Frontiers Research Fund NFRFE-2022-00886Vancouver Foundation F0120-5607
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Community-based drug checking services are challenged in their ability to reliably detect low concentration adulterants that are increasingly present in the illicit drug supply. Spectral signatures from commonly used field instruments such as infrared spectrometers require careful analysis to identify characteristic features in a complex mixture. In this study, we train neural network models for the detection of bromazolam and para-fluorofentanyl, using infrared absorption data collected at a point-of-care drug checking service. The neural network models classified the two components with an F1-score of 0.88 for bromazolam and 0.89 for para-fluorofentanyl. In comparison, a random forest model optimized using the same data set had an F1-score of 0.66 for bromazolam and 0.76 for para-fluorofentanyl. This demonstrates that neutral networks are excellent candidates for such complex drug detection applications and outperform other machine learning-based approaches.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidDrug ContaminationIllicit DrugsNeural Networks, ComputerRandom ForestSpectrophotometry, InfraredAnalgesics, OpioidIllicit Drugs

Identifiers

PMID41785878
PMCPMC13122278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.