SynthesisPoultry science2026
Impact of β-mannanase supplementation on broilers fed low-energy diets: A phase feeding meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Poultry science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The presence of β-mannans in poultry feed ingredients and their associated negative effects on nutrient utilization and production performance remain a concern for the poultry industry. Despite efforts to address these effects by exploiting commercial enzymes, like β-mannanase, responses across reported studies remain inconsistent. Hence, this meta-analysis, with a focus on phase feeding, aimed to determine whether β-mannanase supplementation improves growth performance, nutrient digestibility, histomorphology, and immune organ weight in broilers fed low-energy diets. It also explored the source of between-study variation. A literature search from 2004 to August 2024 identified 27 eligible studies. Data from these studies were pooled using Hedges' g to estimate the standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals. Heterogeneity was addressed through subgroup and meta-regression analyses based on β-mannan source, mannan degrader, β-mannanase dose, trial duration, and broiler strain. The quality of the eligible studies was also assessed using the risk of bias checklists for animal studies (SYRCLE) of the Cochrane Collaboration. The random-effects model's SMD estimates revealed that BWG and FCR are markedly improved by β-mannanase in the starter phase compared to the grower phase. However, the dose effect on FCR is influenced by an interaction with duration, which gradually diminishes as the later phase of grow-out progresses. In addition, β-mannanase improved DM and CP digestibility and increased VH, the VH-to-CD ratio, and innate activation (spleen) to maintain intestinal function and efficient nutrient utilization. However, the enzyme's effects on responses can be influenced by dose, its interaction with trial duration, and, to a lesser extent, by mannan source, degrader type, and the broiler strain. This meta-analysis demonstrates that β‑mannanase supplementation is a reliable strategy for mitigating the antinutritive effects of β‑mannans in broiler diets. Supplementation of the enzyme at 968 g/ton within reduced‑energy, phase‑feeding programs consistently improves growth performance, particularly during the starter phase, while maintaining key physiological indicators such as ileal nutrient digestibility, intestinal histomorphology, and immune function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.