Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41785646›Full record

SynthesisPoultry science2026

Impact of β-mannanase supplementation on broilers fed low-energy diets: A phase feeding meta-analysis.

Emmanuel Nuamah, Utibe Mfon Okon, Jongryun Kim, Inhyeok Cheon, S-B Cho, Darae Kang, N-J Choi, Kwanseob Shim

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Poultry science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Emmanuel NuamahDepartment of Animal Biotechnology, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju, South Korea; Department of Animal Science, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju, South Korea.
Utibe Mfon OkonHalal Products Research Institute, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Putra Infoport, 43400 UPM Serdang Selangor.
Jongryun KimDepartment of Animal Biotechnology, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju, South Korea.
Inhyeok CheonDepartment of Animal Science, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju, South Korea.
S-B ChoDepartment of Animal Science, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju, South Korea.
Darae KangDepartment of Animal Biotechnology, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju, South Korea.
N-J ChoiDepartment of Animal Science, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju, South Korea.
Kwanseob ShimDepartment of Animal Biotechnology, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju, South Korea; Department of Agricultural Convergence Technology, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju, South Korea. Electronic address: ksshim@jbnu.ac.kr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The presence of β-mannans in poultry feed ingredients and their associated negative effects on nutrient utilization and production performance remain a concern for the poultry industry. Despite efforts to address these effects by exploiting commercial enzymes, like β-mannanase, responses across reported studies remain inconsistent. Hence, this meta-analysis, with a focus on phase feeding, aimed to determine whether β-mannanase supplementation improves growth performance, nutrient digestibility, histomorphology, and immune organ weight in broilers fed low-energy diets. It also explored the source of between-study variation. A literature search from 2004 to August 2024 identified 27 eligible studies. Data from these studies were pooled using Hedges' g to estimate the standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals. Heterogeneity was addressed through subgroup and meta-regression analyses based on β-mannan source, mannan degrader, β-mannanase dose, trial duration, and broiler strain. The quality of the eligible studies was also assessed using the risk of bias checklists for animal studies (SYRCLE) of the Cochrane Collaboration. The random-effects model's SMD estimates revealed that BWG and FCR are markedly improved by β-mannanase in the starter phase compared to the grower phase. However, the dose effect on FCR is influenced by an interaction with duration, which gradually diminishes as the later phase of grow-out progresses. In addition, β-mannanase improved DM and CP digestibility and increased VH, the VH-to-CD ratio, and innate activation (spleen) to maintain intestinal function and efficient nutrient utilization. However, the enzyme's effects on responses can be influenced by dose, its interaction with trial duration, and, to a lesser extent, by mannan source, degrader type, and the broiler strain. This meta-analysis demonstrates that β‑mannanase supplementation is a reliable strategy for mitigating the antinutritive effects of β‑mannans in broiler diets. Supplementation of the enzyme at 968 g/ton within reduced‑energy, phase‑feeding programs consistently improves growth performance, particularly during the starter phase, while maintaining key physiological indicators such as ileal nutrient digestibility, intestinal histomorphology, and immune function.

Indexed as

beta-MannosidaseChickensAnimal FeedAnimal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsDietDietary SupplementsDigestionbeta-MannosidaseIleum morphologyImmune functionMeta-analysisPhase feedingβ-mannanase

Identifiers

PMID41785646
PMCPMC12972511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.