Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41785453›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2026

Automated Annotation of Pain Chronicity in Patients With Back Pain by Using Electronic Health Records: Retrospective Study.

Simran Ajay Kanal, Jeannie Bailey, Jeffrey Lotz, Aaron Scheffler, Thomas Peterson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Simran Ajay KanalDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID 0009-0002-6712-6153
Jeannie BaileyDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4618-7512
Jeffrey LotzDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9654-0647
Aaron SchefflerDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3212-748X
Thomas PetersonDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2562-6574

Funding

UCSF Core Center for Patient-centric Mechanistic Phenotyping in Chronic Low Back PainU19AR076737 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI LOTZ, JEFFREY C. · 2019 to 2023
$34.1M
NIAMS NIH HHS U19 AR076737
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChronic back pain is a severe health condition with underlying biopsychosocial factors that make diagnosis difficult, and pain chronicity has been shown to be an important variable for studying patient outcomes. Due to the absence of standardized criteria, pain chronicity needs to be manually annotated by clinicians in electronic health records (EHRs), which is not only time consuming but also has the potential to introduce variability in analysis and interpretation among practitioners.

objectivePain chronicity is not typically recorded in EHRs and currently needs to be manually annotated by experts. Using a dataset from an interdisciplinary spine clinic consisting of 386 patients manually annotated for pain chronicity by clinical experts, this study has two objectives: (1) to examine the relationship between expert-annotated chronicity and social determinant variables present in EHRs and (2) to evaluate the feasibility of extracting pain chronicity from the EHR without expert annotation.

methodsWe used a supervised machine learning model, specifically univariate regression, to examine associations between clinician-annotated pain chronicity values and the structured variables present in EHRs. Next, we trained a random forest model to predict pain chronicity by using both structured and unstructured data extracted by clinical Text Analysis and Knowledge Extraction System, a natural language processing (NLP) tool. The features extracted included clinical keywords; duration of pain reported; and the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes. The model was assessed using the Pearson correlation coefficient and mean absolute error (MAE).

resultsThe study analyzed 386 patients (mean age 60.2 years, SD 16.1 years and median age 62.0 years, IQR 48.8-72.0 years) from the San Francisco Bay Area, with 62.7% (n=242) identifying as women. Our univariate regression analysis identified structured EHR variables associated with pain chronicity, which include pain severity before the last visit (P=.006), number of imaging orders (P=.006), number of visits to the neurology department (P=.01), and Medi-Cal insurance coverage (P=.03). Our random forest model using structured data showed a strong correlation of 0.887 (P<.001) with an MAE of 18.45 between predicted and observed chronicity, whereas our model that used the NLP tool to extract information from unstructured clinical notes and structured data showed a slightly higher correlation of 0.968 (P<.001) with an MAE of 10.87 between predicted and observed chronicity.

conclusionsOur study indicates that pain chronicity from EHR data could be used to study more topics on larger datasets in the future without the need for manual annotation and that using NLP tools to automate prediction is feasible.

Indexed as

Back PainChronic PainElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansMachine LearningMiddle AgedPain MeasurementRetrospective Studiesalgorithmschronic back painclinical decision supportelectronic health recordslongitudinal datamachine annotationmachine learningmedical informaticsphenotypingpredictiontime series analysis

Identifiers

PMID41785453
PMCPMC13003205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.