Observational studyActa orthopaedica2026
Patient satisfaction and patient-reported outcome measures after primary ankle arthrodesis: 2-year results from the Swedish Ankle Registry.
Observational study in Acta orthopaedica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeAnkle arthrodesis (AA) and total ankle replacement are the 2 main surgical treatment options for advanced ankle arthritis but information is scarce on satisfaction and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after surgery. We aimed to evaluate postoperative satisfaction, changes in PROMs from before to 2 years after AA, and factors associated with the outcome.
methodsThis is a national registry-based observational study using the Swedish Ankle Registry. We identified 1,145 patients who underwent AA between 2008 and 2020 who answered a question on satisfaction, and between 662 and 702 patients who answered pre- and 2-year postoperative PROMs (SElf reported Foot and Ankle Score [SEFAS], EQ-5D index, and EQ-5D VAS). We analyzed changes in scores and associations between surgical/patient factors (including preoperative PROMs) and the outcomes satisfaction/postoperative PROM score.
resultsAll mean PROM scores improved from before to 2 years postoperatively (all P < 0.001). 69% of the patients were satisfied with the procedure, 15% uncertain, and 16% dissatisfied. Satisfaction was associated with higher preoperative SEFAS score and dissatisfaction with lower preoperative SEFAS score. Higher SEFAS score was associated with male sex and osteoarthritis (compared with rheumatoid arthritis), while higher EQ-5D index and EQ-5D VAS scores were associated with male sex, posttraumatic arthritis, osteoarthritis (compared with rheumatoid arthritis), and higher age.
conclusionThe majority (69%) of patients treated with AA are satisfied with the procedure and a higher preoperative SEFAS score is associated with postoperative satisfaction. We speculate that preoperative SEFAS score may be useful for predicting postoperative outcomes and will facilitate preoperative patient discussions on expected results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.