Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41785325›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2026

Convolutional neural networks outperform other presence-only species distribution modeling algorithms.

Akash Anand, Benjamin Deneu, Volker C Radeloff

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Akash AnandSILVIS Lab, Department of Forest and Wildlife Ecology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706.ORCID 0000-0003-1086-5676
Benjamin DeneuBiodiversity and Conservation Biology, Swiss Federal Research Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research WSL, Birmensdorf 8903, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-0640-5706
Volker C RadeloffSILVIS Lab, Department of Forest and Wildlife Ecology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706.ORCID 0000-0001-9004-221X

Funding

NASA Biodiversity program 80NSSC21K1348NASA FINESST 80NSSC24K1908
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Species distribution models (SDMs) are essential tools for ecologists and conservationists because they can identify environmental determinants of species occurrences and predict species distributions. Unfortunately, most SDM algorithms rely on point-based or localized averages of environmental conditions and do not capture spatial heterogeneity and landscape patterns that shape species distributions. However, species-environment relationships are hierarchical, with different environmental factors shaping realized niche at different spatial extents. Using presence-only data, we evaluated whether convolutional neural networks (CNNs), which capture three crucial aspects of spatial context (heterogeneity, pattern, and multiscale relationships), outperform other SDM algorithms in predicting species distributions. We benchmarked CNNs against other widely used algorithms, including Maxent and ensemble models, and modeled 225 species from diverse geographic regions and taxonomic groups. We also assessed the efficiency of data augmentation in mitigating CNNs' sensitivity to limited training data. We found that CNNs consistently outperformed other algorithms. CNNs utilizing augmented data achieved median AUC

Indexed as

AlgorithmsConvolutional Neural NetworksModels, BiologicalAnimalsBiodiversityConservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystemPrediction Algorithmsdeep SDMMaxentpresence-onlyspatial context and rare speciesspecies-specific SDM

Identifiers

PMID41785325
PMCPMC12974460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.