ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2026
Convolutional neural networks outperform other presence-only species distribution modeling algorithms.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Species distribution models (SDMs) are essential tools for ecologists and conservationists because they can identify environmental determinants of species occurrences and predict species distributions. Unfortunately, most SDM algorithms rely on point-based or localized averages of environmental conditions and do not capture spatial heterogeneity and landscape patterns that shape species distributions. However, species-environment relationships are hierarchical, with different environmental factors shaping realized niche at different spatial extents. Using presence-only data, we evaluated whether convolutional neural networks (CNNs), which capture three crucial aspects of spatial context (heterogeneity, pattern, and multiscale relationships), outperform other SDM algorithms in predicting species distributions. We benchmarked CNNs against other widely used algorithms, including Maxent and ensemble models, and modeled 225 species from diverse geographic regions and taxonomic groups. We also assessed the efficiency of data augmentation in mitigating CNNs' sensitivity to limited training data. We found that CNNs consistently outperformed other algorithms. CNNs utilizing augmented data achieved median AUC
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.