ArticlePloS one2026
Integrated microwave cavity perturbation sensor for nondestructive estimation of moisture content of grains: A case study on wheat and chickpea.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study presents a low-cost, integrated microwave cavity perturbation sensor operating in TM010 mode at 2.45 GHz for the non-destructive estimation of moisture content (MC) in wheat and chickpea grains. Unlike conventional methods that rely on expensive vector network analyzers (VNAs), this system uses a custom-designed circuit to derive a density-independent moisture content function, M(Ψ). Various machine learning models (ML) were trained to predict MC and classify grain types based on these dialectical metrics. The results demonstrate that bagging (BAG), k-nearest neighbors (k-NN), and reduced-error pruning trees (REPTree) models significantly outperform deep learning models. The BAG model achieved the highest predictive performance, yielding correlation coefficients (R) of 0.995 for wheat and 0.989 for chickpea, with root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.207% and 0.302%, respectively. Furthermore, k-NN variants achieved 100% accuracy in classifying the grain types. The proposed system offers a precise, rapid, and cost-effective alternative for real-time grain quality monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.