SynthesisPloS one2026
Racial variations in sciatic nerve anatomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe sciatic nerve (SN), the longest and largest nerve in the body, arises from the L4-S3 nerve roots and exits as a single trunk below the piriformis muscle through the greater sciatic foramen. However, variations in its anatomy are common, believed to originate from embryological development. These variations show significant racial and geographical differences, which have often been overlooked in previous review studies. Therefore, this meta-analysis aims to address this gap by systematically reviewing global data to evaluate the impact of race on sciatic nerve variations.
methodsA systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to assess the pooled prevalence of SN variations among racial subgroups. A comprehensive literature search was performed using PubMed, Google Scholar, Hinari, and additional sources, including major anatomical journals and cross-referenced articles. Subgroup analyses by region and country were also conducted using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed with the Cochrane Q test and the I² statistic.
resultsType A, considered the normal pattern, had the highest pooled prevalence at 86%. The remaining 14% represented variations of the sciatic nerve (SN). Among these, Type B was the most common at 7%, followed by Type C and G each observed in 2% of limbs, while less frequent variations included Type Type D (1%), Type E (0%), and Type F (0% (0-1)). Racial analysis showed that SN variations occurred in 15% of Asians, 12% of Whites, and 13% of Blacks. Regarding continents, the highest prevalence was in Asia with 15%, the second highest prevalence was observed in Europe with 14%, followed by Africa with 13%, and the lowest in America with 11%. No significant differences were found among the races and continents. However, East Asia showed the highest significant prevalence, with China at 35% and Japan at 32%.
conclusionThis review revealed only modest and statistically non-significant differences in the prevalence of sciatic nerve variations across broad racial and continental groups. In contrast, substantial variation was observed at the regional level, with particularly high prevalence rates in East Asian countries, specifically China and Japan. These findings suggest that regional factors contribute more to the observed variations than racial factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.