ArticlePloS one2026
An ex vivo functional biomarker of treatment response in pediatric low-grade glioma.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advancing glioblastoma research by establishing a whole brain slice model.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Rapid Functional Drug Screening of Passage-Zero Patient Brain Tumor Tissues Ex Vivo: Results from a Clinical Feasibility Study.Research square · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Children with subtotally resected pediatric low-grade glioma (pLGG) often face multiple lines of treatment, which are seldom capable of eliminating the entire tumor. Genomics-based biomarkers are often used to select targeted therapies, but this paradigm only yields overall response rates of ~50%. Functional precision medicine (FPM), where patient-specific therapeutic efficacy is evaluated by directly treating individuals' tumor outside their body, can predict individualized drug responses for some cancers, but pLGG is notoriously difficult to maintain outside the body, limiting development of FPM for pLGG. We describe the first platform that can maintain, treat, and analyze zero-passage pLGG tumor tissue ex vivo, facilitating FPM testing. Here, we tested pLGG tumors on our previously validated Screening Live Cancer Explants (SLiCE) platform, which allows engraftment and testing of diverse CNS tumor types atop organotypic brain slice cultures (OBSCs). After ensuring reproducible engraftment and maintenance of all three living pLGG tumor tissues on SLiCE, we measured MAPK pathway response to targeted therapies via immunoblotting. In the tested BRAF KIAA1549 fusion+ tumor, Western blot demonstrated maintenance of expected paradoxical MAPK upregulation in response to dabrafenib treatment. We then measured tumor response to targeted therapies on SLiCE. As expected, none of the BRAF KIAA1549 fusion+ pLGG tumors were sensitive to dabrafenib treatment. Two out of the three tumors demonstrated predicted sensitivity to trametinib, whereas one tumor did not. While no clinical correlates were measured in this proof-of-concept study, this mixed response to MEK inhibition on SLiCE is representative of heterogeneous real-world clinical responses. Together, these data demonstrate the feasibility of SLiCE to become a new functional biomarker of response in a tumor type where functional models are exceptionally rare, establishing a foundation for future individualized treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.