Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41785216›Full record

ReviewPublic health genomics2026

The Path to Screening US Newborns for Severe Combined Immunodeficiency, 1968-2018: A Narrative Review of a Successful Biomedical Research and Public Health Partnership.

Scott D Grosse, Robert F Vogt, Golriz K Yazdanpanah, Kee Chan, Marcus Gaffney, Anne M Comeau

Abstract readReviewHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Review in Public health genomics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Scott D GrosseNewborn Screening and Molecular Biology Branch, National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, sgrosse@umn.edu.
Robert F VogtNewborn Screening and Molecular Biology Branch, National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Golriz K YazdanpanahNewborn Screening and Molecular Biology Branch, National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Kee ChanValueMinded LLC, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.
Marcus GaffneyNewborn Screening and Molecular Biology Branch, National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Anne M ComeauNew England Newborn Screening Program, Department of Pediatrics, UMass Chan School of Medicine, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNewborn screening for severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) represents an important advancement in public health genomics as the first DNA-based primary screening test in newborn screening programs. The story of how this process took place in the USA during the first two decades of the current century can provide useful lessons for the fields of newborn screening and public health genomics. SUMMARY: Newborn screening for SCID was officially recommended at the national level in the USA in 2010 and fully implemented by 2018. It was preceded by the development and evaluation of treatments administered to infants with SCID at varying ages. Evidence of better outcomes with early treatment by hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, published beginning in 1998, led to the exploration of practical screening assays beginning in 2001, followed by pilot screening studies conducted beginning in 2008, and full implementation in US screening programs between 2010 and 2018. Technical, logistical, and funding challenges in implementing the needed genomic technologies in public health programs were met through creative partnerships. KEY MESSAGES: The development of newborn screening for new rare disorders can require multiple years of painstaking research and implementation science. Support and cooperation among patient advocacy groups, clinical experts, public health researchers, and government agencies are essential for the successful rollout of new newborn screening tests and follow-up protocols.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchNeonatal ScreeningPublic HealthSevere Combined ImmunodeficiencyHistory, 21st CenturyHumansInfant, NewbornUnited StatesNewborn screening policySevere combined immunodeficiencyT-cell lymphopenia

Identifiers

PMID41785216
PMCPMC13105465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.