Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41785158›Full record

ArticleMSMR2026

Applying distinct approaches to racial and ethnic classification to the surveillance of obstetric and neonatal outcomes in the U.S. military, 2010-2021.

Celeste J Romano, Clinton Hall, Monica Burrell, Anna T Bukowinski, Jackielyn Lanning, Sandra Maduforo, Sandra Michelle Magallon, Zeina G Khodr, Gia R Gumbs, Ava Marie S Conlin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MSMR, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Celeste J RomanoDeployment Health Research Department, Naval Health Research Center, San Diego, CA.
Clinton HallDeployment Health Research Department, Naval Health Research Center, San Diego, CA.
Monica BurrellDeployment Health Research Department, Naval Health Research Center, San Diego, CA.
Anna T BukowinskiDeployment Health Research Department, Naval Health Research Center, San Diego, CA.
Jackielyn LanningDeployment Health Research Department, Naval Health Research Center, San Diego, CA.
Sandra MaduforoDeployment Health Research Department, Naval Health Research Center, San Diego, CA.
Sandra Michelle MagallonDeployment Health Research Department, Naval Health Research Center, San Diego, CA.
Zeina G KhodrDeployment Health Research Department, Naval Health Research Center, San Diego, CA.
Gia R GumbsDeployment Health Research Department, Naval Health Research Center, San Diego, CA.
Ava Marie S ConlinDeployment Health Research Department, Naval Health Research Center, San Diego, CA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditional, mutually exclusive approaches to racial and ethnic classification obscure important differences within major demographic groups and among multiracial populations. This study offers a novel examination of obstetric and neonatal outcomes among pregnant U.S. military service members, by applying multiple approaches to racial and ethnic classification and presenting disaggregated data. Overall, 235,608 births were identified among pregnant service members from 2010 through 2021. Inclusion of service members who identified with each racial group, whether alone or in combination with any other group, increased the American Indian or Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander birth populations by 209.7% and 94.0%, respectively, when compared to mutually exclusive classifications. Prevalences of obstetric outcomes such as cesarean delivery varied among racial and ethnic groups, particularly Asian and Latino populations, for example, Asian Indian, 36.7%; Filipino, 32.3%; Chinese, 26.5%; Puerto Rican, 30.2%; Mexican, 23.2%; and between distinct multiracial populations. Disaggregated estimates ultimately increased visibility of multiracial and Native service members and elucidated patterns indiscernible in aggregated data. Wider adoption of disaggregated racial and ethnic data methods is needed to improve understanding of health outcomes in the Military Health System. Reporting of non-mutually exclusive racial and ethnic groups as well as disaggregated Asian, Hispanic or Latino, and multiracial populations elucidates important differences in obstetric and neonatal outcomes.

Indexed as

EthnicityMilitary PersonnelPopulation SurveillancePregnancy OutcomeRacial GroupsAdultFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancyUnited StatesYoung Adultarmed forcesclassificationdemographicsethnicitygroupgynecologicalinfantmaternalmilitarymultiracialneonatalobstetricpostpartumprenatalraceUnited States

Identifiers

PMID41785158
PMCPMC13016958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.