Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41784985›Full record

Trial reportJAMA oncology2026

Outcomes of Older Adults With Advanced Cancer Who Prefer Quality of Life vs Prolonging Survival: A Secondary Analysis of the GAP70+ Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.

Daniel R Richardson, Ying Wang, Marie Flannery, Mostafa Mohamed, Allison Magnuson, Megan Wells, Rachael Tylock, Enrique Soto-Perez-de-Celis, Clark DuMontier, William Dale and 5 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02054741 (A Geriatric Assessment Intervention for Patients Aged 70 and Over Receiving Chemotherapy or Similar Agents for Advanced Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02054741 nacompletednot on this map

A Geriatric Assessment Intervention for Patients Aged 70 and Over Receiving Chemotherapy or Similar Agents for Advanced Cancer: Reducing Toxicity in Older Adults

TypeinterventionalSponsorSupriya MohileRan2014 to 2021Enrolled733ConditionsAdult Solid Neoplasm, Toxicity, LymphomaArmsComprehensive Geriatric Assessment, Quality-of-Life Assessment, Survey Administration
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Daniel R RichardsonUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill.
Ying WangJames P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York.
Marie FlanneryJames P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York.
Mostafa MohamedJames P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York.
Allison MagnusonJames P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York.
Megan WellsJames P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York.
Rachael TylockJames P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York.
Enrique Soto-Perez-de-CelisUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Cancer Center, Aurora.
Clark DuMontierBrigham and Women's Hospital, VA Boston Healthcare System, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
William DaleCity of Hope, Duarte, California.
Ronald EpsteinJames P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York.
Jeffrey BerenbergHawaii MUNCORP, Honolulu.
Nadia RamdinGeisinger Cancer Institute NCORP, Danville, Pennsylvania.
Supriya MohileJames P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York.
Kah Poh LohJames P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York.

Funding

URCC NCORP Research BaseUG1CA189961 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI Michelle C Janelsins, KAREN M. MUSTIAN · 2014 to 2026
$67.7M
Understanding Treatment Tolerability in Older Patients with CancerU01CA233167 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI MOHILE, SUPRIYA G. · 2018 to 2023
$3.5M
Reducing Chemotherapy Toxicity in Older AdultsR01CA177592 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI MOHILE, SUPRIYA G. · 2013 to 2018
$3.0M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA177592NCI NIH HHS U01 CA233167NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA189961
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Health care systems should strive to achieve outcomes that matter to patients. Limited data exist on the outcomes achieved by patients with cancer with different treatment outcome preferences. Objective: To describe treatment outcome preferences among older adults with advanced cancer and explore differences in outcomes between patients prioritizing survival vs quality of life (QoL), testing the hypothesis that patients prioritizing survival would live longer, while those prioritizing QoL would have fewer treatment-related adverse effects (TRAEs) and hospitalizations. Design, Setting, and Participants: This study was an exploratory secondary analysis of the GAP70+ cluster randomized clinical trial conducted at National Cancer Institute's Community Oncology Research Program centers. Older adults (≥70 years) with incurable solid tumors or lymphoma and 1 or more impaired geriatric assessment domain(s) who were starting a new systemic cancer treatment as part of the GAP70+ trial were eligible. The primary trial took place between July 29, 2014, and March 13, 2019. All secondary analyses were conducted between January 1, 2025, and May 30, 2025. Exposure: Patients were divided into 2 cohorts based on their reported preference for prioritizing extending survival vs maintaining QoL. Main Outcomes and Measures: Treatment outcome preferences, hospitalization, TRAEs, and survival at 6 months and 1 year. Results: A total of 706 patients were included in the analysis. The mean (SD) patient age was 77.2 (5.4) years; 306 (43.3%) were female, and 400 (56.7%) were male. Gastrointestinal (244 patients [34.6%]), lung (175 patients [24.8%]), and genitourinary (109 patients [15.4%]) cancers were the most common. Only 59 patients (8.4%) preferred to prioritize extending survival over maintaining QoL, while 506 patients (71.7%) preferred to prioritize maintaining QoL. No significant associations were identified between cohorts prioritizing survival vs QoL and treatment modifications (risk ratio, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.84-1.27), grade 3 to 5 TRAEs (hazard ratio [HR], 0.84; 95% CI, 0.57-1.23), hospitalization (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.39-1.41), and survival (at 6 months: HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.40-1.29; at 1 year: HR, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.81-1.72). Conclusions and Relevance: In this secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial, fewer than 1 in 10 older adults with advanced cancer participating in the trial prioritized extending survival over maintaining QoL. Patient preference for extending survival or maintaining QoL was not associated with up-front treatment modifications or downstream outcomes, suggesting a possible lack of responsiveness of the current oncology care delivery system to patient preference. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02054741.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsPatient PreferenceQuality of LifeAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID41784985
PMCPMC12964252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.