Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41784961›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2026

Primary Care Involvement and Health Care Utilization Among Patients With End-Stage Kidney Disease.

Kunal Bailoor, Richard A Hirth, Paula Guro, Mary K Oerline, John M Hollingsworth, Vahakn B Shahinian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kunal BailoorDivision of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Richard A HirthDepartment of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor.
Paula GuroDow Division of Health Services Research, Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Mary K OerlineDow Division of Health Services Research, Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
John M HollingsworthDepartment of Urology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville.
Vahakn B ShahinianDivision of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

Funding

Leveraging the ESRD Treatment Choices model to understand the benefits of home versus in-center dialysisR01DK134406 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI RICHARD A HIRTH, John Malcolm Hollingsworth · 2023 to 2026
$2.6M
Training CoreTL1DK136046 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Laura H Mariani · 2022 to 2026
$2.5M
AHRQ HHS R01 HS026908NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK134406NIDDK NIH HHS TL1 DK136046
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Patients with end-stage kidney disease receiving dialysis have disproportionate rates of emergency department utilization and hospitalization. Models of care with primary care physicians may be able to reduce these events, although prior literature has not clearly demonstrated a benefit in the population of patients with end-stage kidney disease. Objective: To determine whether having a primary care practitioner is associated with lower risk of hospitalization and emergency department utilization in the population of patients with end-stage kidney disease. Design, Setting, and Participants: Retrospective, cross-sectional study of patients for whom Medicare Fee for Service was the primary payer with end-stage kidney disease in the contiguous US receiving dialysis between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2019. Differential distance to a dialysis facility with a high level of primary care involvement was an instrumental variable. Data were analyzed from January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2019. Exposure: Presence or absence of primary care physician; instrument of differential distance defined as difference between distance to nearest high primary care-utilizing dialysis facility and distance to nearest dialysis facility of any type, using above or below median differential distance as instrumental variable. Main Outcomes and Measures: Any emergency department visit, emergency department visit not resulting in hospitalization, or hospitalization. Results: Among 181 520 patients (mean [SD] age, 62.6 [14.1]; 102 966 [56.7%] male; 71 953 [39.6%] Black, 27 215 [15.0%] Hispanic, and 97 661 [53.8%] White) with end-stage kidney disease receiving hemodialysis, patients estimated to have primary care involvement by our instrument had a lower estimated risk of any emergency department visit not resulting in hospitalization (51.2%; 95% CI, 49.7%-52.7%) relative to those not estimated to have primary care involvement (72.1%; 95% CI, 69.2%-74.9%; P < .001). There was a lower estimated risk of any emergency department visit in this population as well (69.4%; 95% CI, 68.1%-70.7% in those estimated to have primary care involvement vs 75.0%; 95% CI, 72.5%-77.6% in those not estimated to have primary care involvement). There was no significant difference in estimated risk of any hospitalization. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study of patients with end-stage kidney disease receiving dialysis, primary care physician involvement was associated with reduced emergency department utilization.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalKidney Failure, ChronicPatient Acceptance of Health CarePrimary Health CareAgedCross-Sectional StudiesEmergency Room VisitsFemaleHospitalizationHumansMaleMedicareMiddle AgedRenal DialysisRetrospective StudiesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID41784961
PMCPMC12964153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.