ArticleJAMA network open2026
Mental Health Specialist Telemedicine Uptake and Patient Location.
Article in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of buprenorphine treatment by virtual-only vs. traditional clinicians.Journal of substance use and addiction treatment · 2026Article
- Evaluating the Impact of a National Telehealth Outpatient Mental Health Program in Rural Communities.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Digital infrastructure and proxies of ambulatory care access in Russia, 2018-2024: a regional panel study with a national telemedicine signal analysis.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Wide geographic disparities in mental health care use exist, particularly between rural and urban areas. Telemedicine could enable mental health specialists to reach patients who live farther away in rural communities and communities with low access to care. Objective: To examine the association of the proportion of mental health specialists' visits delivered via telemedicine and the share of their visits to patients living in rural, low-access-to-care, or distant communities. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study examined Medicare fee-for-service claims for mental health specialist services from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2023. Specialists were categorized into quartiles based on their 2021 telemedicine uptake (lowest, 0%-40% of visits; low-middle, 41%-79%; middle-high, 80%-98%; highest, 99%-100% of visits). Data were analyzed between November 2024 and December 2025. Exposure: Telemedicine use among mental health specialists in 2021. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was the proportion of mental health specialists' patients who lived in (1) a rural area, (2) an area with a mental health specialist shortage, (3) a different state from their specialist, and (4) a community 20 miles or more from their specialist. Differential changes in outcomes between specialists in the highest and lowest telemedicine uptake quartiles were estimated using a difference-in-differences framework. A secondary analysis examined the fraction of the changes observed due to established patients moving their residence vs new patients. Results: The cohort included 17 742 mental health specialists categorized into quartiles based on their telemedicine uptake in 2021. Compared with 2018 and specialists in the lowest telemedicine quartile, specialists with the highest telemedicine use had 0.88 percentage points (95% CI, 0.35-1.39 percentage points) more visits with rural patients in 2023. Similar small changes were observed in the fraction of visits with patients living in mental health specialist shortage areas, in a different state from their specialist, and living 20 miles or more away from their specialist. Specialists with higher telemedicine use visited differentially fewer new patients by 2023 than those with lower use (-3.55 percentage points [95% CI, -5.73 to -1.38 percentage points]). Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study found that greater telemedicine uptake was associated with only small increases in the share of visits to patients in rural, low-access-to-care, or distant communities. Tailored policy interventions may be needed for telemedicine to reach its potential of improving mental health care of individuals with the greatest difficulty accessing it in their local community.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.