ReviewInternational journal of clinical oncology2026
Beyond tumor mutational burden: a framework for immune-checkpoint blockade responsiveness in gastrointestinal cancers.
Review in International journal of clinical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Can Chemoradiotherapy Expand Immune Checkpoint Blockade Responsiveness in Mismatch Repair-Proficient Rectal Cancer?Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2026Review
- Review
- MUC16 promotes endometrial cancer progression and modulates sensitivity to lapatinib through the ESR1/PI3K/AKT axis.Translational oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Immune-checkpoint blockade (ICB) elicits profound and durable responses in mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) or microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) gastrointestinal (GI) cancers, yet most microsatellite-stable (MSS) cancers derive minimal benefit. This gap reflects the limited ability of tumor mutational burden (TMB)-a widely used ICB biomarker-to capture true tumor immunogenicity. Only a small fraction of somatic mutations generates peptides that are processed, presented on HLA molecules, and recognized by T cells, and this pool is further restricted by defects in antigen-presentation pathways, including interferon unresponsiveness, epigenetic repression, and irreversible loss of B2M or HLA class I. These limitations have shifted attention toward neoantigen quality, defined by the presentability, clonal expression, and structural distinctiveness of mutation-derived peptides. Yet even high-quality neoantigens remain functionally irrelevant when presentation is impaired. To integrate these layers, we propose effective immunogenic burden (EIB) as a conceptual framework that describes the state in which tumor mutations generate high-quality neoantigen peptides that are successfully presented on HLA molecules for T-cell recognition. By integrating neoantigen quality and antigen-presentation capacity beyond TMB, EIB provides a clinically interpretable basis for understanding heterogeneous responses to ICB in GI cancers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41784875What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.