ArticleEuropean geriatric medicine2026
Beyond pain relief: a thematic exploration of informal caregiver experiences and needs following SPING block treatment in geriatric hip fracture patients.
Article in European geriatric medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- When 'No Surgery' Is Chosen: A Five-Domain Framework for Evaluating Ethical Consent in Non-Operative Hip Fracture Care.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo explore informal caregivers' experiences and preferences regarding decision-making and care processes following the Spinal Phenol IN Glycerol (SPING) block as non-operative pain management in frail older care recipients with a hip fracture. The aim is to improve the care process of the SPING block and improving communication with and support for informal caregivers.
methodsA single-center qualitative study was conducted at Amphia Hospital (the Netherlands) using semi-structured interviews. Informal caregivers of frail, older patients with hip fracture treated with SPING block were purposively sampled until saturation was reached. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim for thematically analysis.
resultsFour dominant themes were identified: (1) Pain relief as a core treatment priority; (2) Complex decision-making and the caregiver's moral burden; (3) Emotional toll and coping with witnessing decline; and (4) Shifting roles and long-term caregiving burden. SPING block was viewed as an acceptable, often preferred non-operative pain management. Informal caregivers valued rapid analgesia and the possibility of early discharge yet described insufficient communication and uncertainty around long-term effects. The caregiving burden extended beyond hospital discharge, with many reporting distress and role conflict.
conclusionInformal caregivers prioritize effective analgesia, compassionate communication and continuity of care when navigating decisions about SPING block in the context of frailty and end-of-life care. These findings underscore the importance of integrated, multidisciplinary protocols that facilitate timely decision-making, align with patient goals and address caregiver needs across care settings. Prospective studies are warranted to evaluate patient-centered outcomes of SPING block and its long-term analgesic effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.