ArticleExperimental brain research2026
Dynamics of cortical excitability in stimulus-response mapping for overt and covert movements is locked to visual stimulus: an LRP-TMS study.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Visual perception enables goal-directed movement control by mapping sensory input onto motor representations. While neural mechanisms of visuomotor integration have been extensively studied, the temporal dynamics of this process during real and mentally simulated movements remain poorly understood, particularly regarding stimulus-driven versus response-driven motor cortex contributions. We used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and electroencephalography (EEG) to investigate cortical activity during physical and imagined hand movements in a stimulus-response task. Single-pulse TMS was delivered to the primary motor cortex at 100, 200, and 400 ms following visual stimulus presentation to probe corticospinal excitability. Motor cortex facilitation during early preparation was found to be stimulus-locked rather than motor response-locked, indicating that visual cues drive initial motor cortex activation. Both motor execution (ME) and kinesthetic motor imagery (kMI) showed similar facilitation dynamics during this early stage, supporting functional equivalence during preparatory processing. However, ME and kMI diverged at later response stages: ME showed elevated excitability whereas in kMI it returned to baseline. EEG analyses confirmed this dissociation at later stages. Notably, kMI did not produce significant hemispheric lateralization, whereas ME generated robust lateralized readiness potentials whose duration correlated with pre-response motor excitability and behavioral performance. These findings challenge conventional response-driven conceptualizations of motor imagery and highlight stimulus-driven mechanisms in visuomotor processing during both overt and imagined movements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41784816What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.