Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41784816›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2026

Dynamics of cortical excitability in stimulus-response mapping for overt and covert movements is locked to visual stimulus: an LRP-TMS study.

Nikolay Syrov, Lev Yakovlev, Artemiy Berkmush-Antipova, Marina Morozova, Alexander Kaplan, Mikhail Lebedev

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nikolay SyrovComputational Neurology Group, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany. kolascoco@gmail.com.
Lev YakovlevFaculty of Biology, Shenzhen MSU-BIT University, Shenzhen, China. leojackovlev@gmail.com.
Artemiy Berkmush-AntipovaBaltic Center for Neurotechnology and Artificial Intelligence, Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University, Kaliningrad, Russia.
Marina MorozovaCenter for Bio- and Medical Technologies, Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Moscow, Russia.
Alexander KaplanLaboratory for Neurophysiology and Neuro-Computer interfaces, Department of Human and Animal Physiology, Faculty of Biology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia.
Mikhail LebedevFaculty of Mechanics and Mathematics, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Visual perception enables goal-directed movement control by mapping sensory input onto motor representations. While neural mechanisms of visuomotor integration have been extensively studied, the temporal dynamics of this process during real and mentally simulated movements remain poorly understood, particularly regarding stimulus-driven versus response-driven motor cortex contributions. We used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and electroencephalography (EEG) to investigate cortical activity during physical and imagined hand movements in a stimulus-response task. Single-pulse TMS was delivered to the primary motor cortex at 100, 200, and 400 ms following visual stimulus presentation to probe corticospinal excitability. Motor cortex facilitation during early preparation was found to be stimulus-locked rather than motor response-locked, indicating that visual cues drive initial motor cortex activation. Both motor execution (ME) and kinesthetic motor imagery (kMI) showed similar facilitation dynamics during this early stage, supporting functional equivalence during preparatory processing. However, ME and kMI diverged at later response stages: ME showed elevated excitability whereas in kMI it returned to baseline. EEG analyses confirmed this dissociation at later stages. Notably, kMI did not produce significant hemispheric lateralization, whereas ME generated robust lateralized readiness potentials whose duration correlated with pre-response motor excitability and behavioral performance. These findings challenge conventional response-driven conceptualizations of motor imagery and highlight stimulus-driven mechanisms in visuomotor processing during both overt and imagined movements.

Indexed as

Brain MappingCortical ExcitabilityEvoked Potentials, MotorImaginationMotor CortexTranscranial Magnetic StimulationVisual PerceptionAdultElectroencephalographyFemaleFunctional LateralityHumansMaleMovementPhotic StimulationReaction TimeLateralized readiness potentialMotor cortexSimple reaction timeStimulus-response mappingTranscranial magnetic stimulation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.