ArticleWiener klinische Wochenschrift2026
Emergency physician attended calls that could have been covered by advanced emergency medical technicians in Austria : Results of the Austrian Emergency Day 2025 audit.
Article in Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEmergency physician-staffed emergency medical services (EMS) in Austria frequently attend low priority calls, raising concerns about over-triage and future workforce sustainability.
objectiveTo quantify the proportion of emergency physician-attended calls that could have been managed by advanced emergency medical technicians (AEMT), with or without telemedical physician support, and evaluate current AEMT practice and training needs.
methodsThis prospective, nationwide audit collected data from public physician-staffed EMS in Austria over a 24‑h period. Emergency physicians documented call characteristics, NACA (National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics) severity scores, AEMT presence, actual and potential EMT or AEMT interventions, accuracy of severity assessment and their judgement regarding the necessity of on-scene physician involvement.
resultsOut of 149 physician-staffed EMS, 88 (59.1%) participated recording 313 calls and 273 emergency calls, 25 interhospital transfers and 15 telemedical emergency physician consultations were included. Emergency physicians assessed that 53.4% (95% confidence interval, CI 46.8-60.0%) of emergency calls and 48.0% (95% CI 28.4-67.6%) of interhospital transfers could have been managed by AEMTs. Approximately one third of these would have required telemedical physician support. The AEMTs arrived on the scene before emergency physicians in 75.1% of emergency calls and correctly assessed disease severity in 88.4% of cases and one or more additional interventions could have been set by AEMTs before emergency physician arrival in 48.0% of emergency calls. Most physicians supported expanding AEMT competencies and telemedical physician services.
conclusionThe results of this nationwide audit suggest that more than half of emergency calls and interhospital transfers attended by emergency physicians in Austria could have been managed by AEMTs with or without telemedical emergency physician support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.