Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41784791›Full record

ReviewUrologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2026

[Three-piece inflatable penile prosthesis implantation in clinical practice].

Daniar Osmonov, Agnieszka Chomicz, Axel Stuart Merseburger, Marie Christine Roesch

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Daniar OsmonovKlinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538, Lübeck, Deutschland. Daniar.osmonov@uksh.de.
Agnieszka ChomiczAndroClinic Medical Centre, Bialystok, Polen.
Axel Stuart MerseburgerKlinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538, Lübeck, Deutschland.
Marie Christine RoeschKlinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538, Lübeck, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThree-piece inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) implantation is the gold standard for refractory erectile dysfunction.

objectiveThis work provides a practical overview of indications, perioperative management, surgical techniques, and complication management.

methodsThe article comprises a narrative review based on European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines and relevant literature.

resultsAn IPP is indicated after failure of conservative therapies and in Peyronie's disease, priapism, or after gender-affirming surgery. A penoscrotal approach offers advantages. Modern implants and infection prevention reduce complications. Ectopic reservoir placement is safe, especially in pre-operated patients.

conclusionInflatable penile prosthesis implantation is safe, effective, and highly satisfactory when performed with standardized techniques and structured perioperative management.

Indexed as

Erectile DysfunctionPenile ImplantationPenile ProsthesisHumansMalePenile IndurationPostoperative ComplicationsPriapismProsthesis DesignErectile dysfunctionGender-affirming surgeryPeyronie’s diseasePriapismSexual dysfunction

Identifiers

PMID41784791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.